From: Robert Pluim <rpluim@gmail.com>
To: Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org>
Cc: kevin.legouguec@gmail.com, emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: Better emoji support
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:03:20 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87czp3jt5z.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <83y27r1sku.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Mon, 20 Sep 2021 12:53:21 +0300")
>>>>> On Mon, 20 Sep 2021 12:53:21 +0300, Eli Zaretskii <eliz@gnu.org> said:
Eli> I think the presentation of the Emoji appearance for non-Emoji
Eli> characters followed by VS-16 is less important than being able to
Eli> display sequences of Emoji characters, so we will be doing OK, IMO, if
Eli> Emacs 28 only supported the latter.
OK. Whilst updating the emoji sequences support to Unicode-14, I had
to add the following ranges to the 'emoji' script, since otherwise
they donʼt end up getting composed, because Emacs doesnʼt use the
'emoji' font for them. Theyʼre all Emoji_Presentation=No, but
emoji-zwj-sequences.txt modifies them with FE0F
(why didnʼt they just change them to Emoji_Presentation=Yes? I see
very little consistency between similar codepoints that nonetheless
have different Emoji_Presentation values)
(#x26F9 #x26F9 emoji)
(#x2764 #x2764 emoji)
(#x1f3cb #x1f3cc emoji)
(#x1f3f3 #x1f3f4 emoji)
(#x1f441 #x1f441 emoji)
(#x1f575 #x1f575 emoji)
So we get to pick our poison: complete consistency with the
Emoji_Presentation property from emoji-data.txt, or having complete
coverage for emoji-zwj-sequences.txt. Eli? (Iʼll admit to having a
slight preference for the latter, given that I find Emoji_Presentation
to be somewhat arbitrary for quite a few codepoints)
Robert
--
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-09-20 13:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 73+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-07-10 9:19 Better emoji support Eli Zaretskii
2021-07-10 9:24 ` Robert Pluim
2021-07-10 9:37 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-07-10 9:45 ` Robert Pluim
2021-07-10 9:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-07-12 8:27 ` Robert Pluim
2021-07-12 14:02 ` Robert Pluim
2021-07-12 15:38 ` Robert Pluim
2021-07-12 15:59 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-07-13 7:00 ` Jean Louis
2021-07-13 7:50 ` Robert Pluim
2021-07-15 15:15 ` Robert Pluim
2021-07-15 15:44 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-13 12:36 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-13 15:44 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-13 16:07 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-13 16:36 ` Jean-Christophe Helary
2021-09-17 13:01 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-17 13:42 ` Jean-Christophe Helary
2021-09-17 13:50 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-17 15:51 ` Kévin Le Gouguec
2021-09-17 16:43 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-17 19:34 ` Kévin Le Gouguec
2021-09-19 18:27 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-19 19:43 ` Kévin Le Gouguec
2021-09-20 4:23 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-20 6:20 ` Kévin Le Gouguec
2021-09-20 6:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-20 8:40 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-20 9:53 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-20 13:03 ` Robert Pluim [this message]
2021-09-20 13:15 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-20 13:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-20 13:50 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-20 15:27 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-20 17:32 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-20 18:54 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-20 19:30 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-20 19:42 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-20 20:05 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-20 13:40 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-20 13:45 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-17 15:58 ` Jean-Christophe Helary
2021-09-17 16:35 ` Daniel Martín
2021-09-17 16:52 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-17 15:39 ` Stephen Berman
2021-09-17 16:01 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-17 16:34 ` Stephen Berman
2021-09-17 16:58 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-17 17:05 ` Stephen Berman
2021-09-17 17:10 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-17 17:17 ` Stephen Berman
2021-09-17 17:37 ` Better emoji support, " Robert Pluim
2021-09-17 17:49 ` Stephen Berman
2021-09-17 17:51 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-17 18:53 ` martin rudalics
2021-09-17 18:58 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-17 19:44 ` Stephen Berman
2021-09-17 18:53 ` martin rudalics
2021-09-17 16:55 ` martin rudalics
2021-09-17 18:48 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-17 18:59 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-18 5:39 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-18 6:25 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-19 16:09 ` Juri Linkov
2021-09-19 17:16 ` Kévin Le Gouguec
2021-09-19 18:20 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-19 19:13 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-19 17:24 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-19 18:10 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-19 18:29 ` Eli Zaretskii
2021-09-19 18:40 ` Robert Pluim
2021-09-19 18:34 ` Eli Zaretskii
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87czp3jt5z.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=rpluim@gmail.com \
--cc=eliz@gnu.org \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=kevin.legouguec@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).