From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Tick Reduction Date: Sun, 21 Nov 2021 20:34:32 +0100 Message-ID: <87czmtl2uv.fsf@gnus.org> References: <87bl2hyzca.fsf@gnus.org> <8735nszpdv.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfvswrp8.fsf@gnus.org> <834k88woaj.fsf@gnu.org> <878rxkv980.fsf@gnus.org> <87sfvpmtl8.fsf@gnus.org> <83pmqtqvj5.fsf@gnu.org> <87bl2dmnfa.fsf@gnus.org> <83mtlxquh7.fsf@gnu.org> <877dd1mlsd.fsf@gnus.org> <83k0h1qss5.fsf@gnu.org> <8735npmkm5.fsf@gnus.org> <83h7c5qpag.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="33868"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, stefankangas@gmail.com, dgutov@yandex.ru To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Nov 21 20:37:05 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mose9-0008ap-Js for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 20:37:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58902 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mose8-0003gI-FH for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 14:37:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([209.51.188.92]:56256) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mosbq-0001Fw-2I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 14:34:43 -0500 Original-Received: from [2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2] (port=46298 helo=quimby.gnus.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1mosbo-0005Mu-KD; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 14:34:41 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gnus.org; s=20200322; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:In-Reply-To:Date: References:Subject:Cc:To:From:Sender:Reply-To:Content-Transfer-Encoding: Content-ID:Content-Description:Resent-Date:Resent-From:Resent-Sender: Resent-To:Resent-Cc:Resent-Message-ID:List-Id:List-Help:List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe:List-Post:List-Owner:List-Archive; bh=WiJ7Eml0vHvhkhCvfiiAGgkb0sRBGVr2alzv8EBQh/0=; b=OSXUPq9RHmAEIn/hAjLEmBovYO yBStVc70RhtYz3gATRghphzADHapq2hnUfOE3NkaZN/tnL9NhDap0ZMIr9UbIJh1Ym+uAyyAC2Ec7 4GKlZ+vtijkYz2/6rNmdtmjbACQebrXCbjfOBiz2RnOjkHIYAHTZIFAPI6VKvfAxeV9w=; Original-Received: from [84.212.220.105] (helo=xo) by quimby.gnus.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.3:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1mosbg-00006m-Ra; Sun, 21 Nov 2021 20:34:35 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAABGdBTUEAALGPC/xhBQAAACBj SFJNAAB6JgAAgIQAAPoAAACA6AAAdTAAAOpgAAA6mAAAF3CculE8AAAAHlBMVEX0vDD7xDTNni2z jS2Nby5YRSJZUE9lWlKzsrH///8JT23mAAAAAWJLR0QJ8dml7AAAAAd0SU1FB+ULFRMeMpi8xVsA AAGmSURBVDjLdZLBUsIwEIZ3g9x3qw/QJs54hSCcGRXuCugdMblzSN/A4bHdBGibUgOTdvbrn393 /gAAIDPHBwHIHzitczm+YFFyZ10/YAKtcQiwsmYQFNrqoaNI5ydFQOmprbSUAeI3YqVnOqtHxeOW CjvTCNQ1AVTb1cSAxSiruor5+4dWtiQU/y4Yr3ZbrbTBXl9QbF53LzMzq6ReZh52vqu0sXpiymxy tdoJUEZQPuDYbpYkYxib1QWMlhKCsaakHNxvUcIxuswHF/MYHowmmNdTVZaqAPsAieLWq58zBwC4 BdFnGBCq9tZ0ARbrKcGtOai1O9weJoLVZ3BH6hOwEJzzvorhZ8A8O1nhWyJnzI+6c15+xzQmNzIg orWT09y0ud7nXfJ/EIFz39gzl20dbdwyc4cRR0lc0plkgh0F4SKRPaUI8HyZpylGd/G/3H66AMYn 8Q/1oeMPy/Qoggu+DsemjqkrTlPWofZV3m48Vab88fW+BddvpGWRhEbSBrfwp18fGvc2hMKdan/g WwU/ff2G/RAQf1cNAX7wrSADvJj+A4rO+x8Ynnbz2HAz3wAAACV0RVh0ZGF0ZTpjcmVhdGUAMjAy MS0xMS0yMVQxOTozMDo1MCswMDowMBj9O4EAAAAldEVYdGRhdGU6bW9kaWZ5ADIwMjEtMTEtMjFU MTk6MzA6NTArMDA6MDBpoIM9AAAAAElFTkSuQmCC X-Now-Playing: Hot Chip's _Coming on Strong_: "The Beach Party" In-Reply-To: <83h7c5qpag.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Sun, 21 Nov 2021 21:31:03 +0200") X-Host-Lookup-Failed: Reverse DNS lookup failed for 2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2 (failed) Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a01:4f9:2b:f0f::2; envelope-from=larsi@gnus.org; helo=quimby.gnus.org X-Spam_score_int: -35 X-Spam_score: -3.6 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RDNS_NONE=0.793, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:279877 Archived-At: Eli Zaretskii writes: > I think we may be mis-communicating. Can you take an example of a > full mode line and tell which part(s) of it will use proportional > fonts "as usual", which will use glyphs from proportional fonts with > monospaced advance width, and which will use monospaced fonts? > Because currently I'm utterly confused regarding what you'd like to > change there and how. And consequently, I don't understand what are > the benefits of making such changes. The entire mode line should use the same proportional font. Bits that are liable to shift around should be monospacialised, and the only parts that shift around are the "U:---" bit at the start and the line/column bits (including spacers at the end). -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog: http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no