From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Emanuel Berg Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: noverlay branch Date: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 02:05:03 +0200 Message-ID: <87czb01r2o.fsf@dataswamp.org> References: <87sfjzefvv.fsf@rfc20.org> <875ygt6gbj.fsf@rfc20.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="19575"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:VcA04Fq5nekg9FsURiEeFVlIpbA= Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 10 07:43:36 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ohlZg-0004vt-Fm for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 07:43:36 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:34270 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohlZe-0006Li-Te for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 01:43:34 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56532) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohgMw-0002KH-HL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 20:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214]:50612) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ohgMu-0005zq-Ke for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 09 Oct 2022 20:10:06 -0400 Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ohgMs-0001eu-6Y for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 10 Oct 2022 02:10:02 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Mail-Copies-To: never Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214; envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io X-Spam_score_int: -15 X-Spam_score: -1.6 X-Spam_bar: - X-Spam_report: (-1.6 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.25, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Mon, 10 Oct 2022 01:39:51 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297307 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier wrote: >> In any case, I do have a new test for >> tests/src/buffer-tests.el that crashes feature/noverlay >> Emacs immediately, when ENABLE_CHECKING is on, in a spot in >> itree.c having to do with offset inheritance. > > I tightened up a few things and the code now passes the > tests without crashing any more. I know only of the byte-compiler and checkdoc https://dataswamp.org/~incal/emacs-init/ide/pack-style.el If you have something more I want it please :) If we talk Elisp in general ... -- underground experts united https://dataswamp.org/~incal