From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Philip Kaludercic Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 12f63c18f6 1/2: Add new macro 'while-let' Date: Sat, 15 Oct 2022 14:12:24 +0000 Message-ID: <87czat5g6v.fsf@posteo.net> References: <166436449368.11560.17915607619196292155@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20220928112814.B0924C12D9B@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87ill7ldwb.fsf@posteo.net> <8735cajwwp.fsf@gnus.org> <87a66immpi.fsf@posteo.net> <87v8p6h04z.fsf@gnus.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="34012"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Lars Ingebrigtsen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 15 16:13:35 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1ojhuw-0008ho-Jv for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 16:13:34 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:54362 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ojhuv-0007Ff-0t for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 10:13:33 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35442) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ojhu4-0006aR-NN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 10:12:41 -0400 Original-Received: from mout02.posteo.de ([185.67.36.66]:58963) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1ojhu2-0002LE-BC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 10:12:40 -0400 Original-Received: from submission (posteo.de [185.67.36.169]) by mout02.posteo.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3AC1F240103 for ; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 16:12:33 +0200 (CEST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=posteo.net; s=2017; t=1665843156; bh=qUgQLSmmXaW96yFOOUi8A/hhdzsQpvgP8pXVYmp/Mw8=; h=From:To:Cc:Subject:Autocrypt:Date:From; b=alYpJkUS6TdLc7qL2By6kx/NMYYiMGqQRJF9XJAQr2rOnsXMQCLSUnk3Odg7xLNWm 3YFlZIYtk+B1ZR2Adv/4wVY0eOnUk0plSZlbB6h66mdQQUiS4Gg7TkT3773EponM6y oKfCq/G1Ei5eqcfNVVNI5tTEtm67UmEauvPA3+oQnnAkPb/ys3j8dvtCLKM9sMTBfw XEVPWNHuLMOJK7cKER/WY577qaGyGhZV+2h/koe8B4kXVyEw54lGjOWPBSCuDHA3hY +/brh5pZgcSBjdJ16eNNIHqymYgSJhn5J1jYb+BOsnEEBH62vb1ENmDru7P97+PWXp 5MTDHBBh59row== Original-Received: from customer (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by submission (posteo.de) with ESMTPSA id 4MqQFF0TX0z9rxD; Sat, 15 Oct 2022 16:12:32 +0200 (CEST) In-Reply-To: <87v8p6h04z.fsf@gnus.org> (Lars Ingebrigtsen's message of "Thu, 29 Sep 2022 13:48:28 +0200") Autocrypt: addr=philipk@posteo.net; prefer-encrypt=nopreference; keydata= mDMEYHHqUhYJKwYBBAHaRw8BAQdAp3GdmYJ6tm5McweY6dEvIYIiry+Oz9rU4MH6NHWK0Ee0QlBo aWxpcCBLYWx1ZGVyY2ljIChnZW5lcmF0ZWQgYnkgYXV0b2NyeXB0LmVsKSA8cGhpbGlwa0Bwb3N0 ZW8ubmV0PoiQBBMWCAA4FiEEDM2H44ZoPt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwMFCwkIBwIGFQoJ CAsCBBYCAwECHgECF4AACgkQtVrAHPRh1FyTkgEAjlbGPxFchvMbxzAES3r8QLuZgCxeAXunM9gh io0ePtUBALVhh9G6wIoZhl0gUCbQpoN/UJHI08Gm1qDob5zDxnIHuDgEYHHqUhIKKwYBBAGXVQEF AQEHQNcRB+MUimTMqoxxMMUERpOR+Q4b1KgncDZkhrO2ql1tAwEIB4h4BBgWCAAgFiEEDM2H44Zo Pt9Ms0eHtVrAHPRh1FwFAmBx6lICGwwACgkQtVrAHPRh1Fw1JwD/Qo7kvtib8jy7puyWrSv0MeTS g8qIxgoRWJE/KKdkCLEA/jb9b9/g8nnX+UcwHf/4VfKsjExlnND3FrBviXUW6NcB Received-SPF: pass client-ip=185.67.36.66; envelope-from=philipk@posteo.net; helo=mout02.posteo.de X-Spam_score_int: -27 X-Spam_score: -2.8 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.8 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:297778 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Philip Kaludercic writes: > >> In that case ought the macro not be called `while-let*'? > > Nope. We're pretending that the * versions of these macros don't exist > (by not mentioning them in the manual), and we're likewise pretending > that if-let doesn't have wider semantics than the * version (by not > mentioning that, either). On that topic, why do we have `and-let*' and no `and-let'?