From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: main.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?iso-8859-15?q?J=E9r=F4me_Marant?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Clipboard and coding systems Date: Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:29:50 +0100 Message-ID: <87bre6k65d.fsf@marant.org> References: <871xfuzyo8.fsf@marant.org> <200410250124.KAA12336@etlken.m17n.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: deer.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1100039457 6005 80.91.229.6 (9 Nov 2004 22:30:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 9 Nov 2004 22:30:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Nov 09 23:30:49 2004 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by deer.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1CReVl-0005GR-00 for ; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 23:30:49 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRee8-0001Bj-2R for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 17:39:28 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CRee0-0001Bd-1S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 17:39:20 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CRedz-0001BR-KZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 17:39:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CRedz-0001BO-HK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 17:39:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [62.4.16.102] (helo=kraid.nerim.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CReV7-0005Gn-Lf; Tue, 09 Nov 2004 17:30:09 -0500 Original-Received: from amboise (jmarant.net1.nerim.net [62.212.105.6]) by kraid.nerim.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0276741CB7; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:30:07 +0100 (CET) Original-Received: by amboise (Postfix, from userid 1000) id C4A452C1E6; Tue, 9 Nov 2004 23:29:50 +0100 (CET) Original-To: Kenichi Handa In-Reply-To: <200410250124.KAA12336@etlken.m17n.org> (Kenichi Handa's message of "Mon, 25 Oct 2004 10:24:05 +0900 (JST)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.1006 (Gnus v5.10.6) Emacs/21.3 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: main.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:29680 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:29680 Kenichi Handa writes: > So, my question is: Should Emacs still support pasting form > an application that uses only a cut buffer? If not, we can > make x-cut-buffer-or-selection-value not check a cut buffer, > then, we can store encoded string in a cut buffer by > x-set-cut-buffer? > > Another way is to solve this problem (the comment before > x-cut-buffer-or-selection-value) not in > x-cut-buffer-or-selection-value. > > ;;; If this function is called twice and finds the same text, > ;;; it returns nil the second time. This is so that a single > ;;; selection won't be added to the kill ring over and over. Hi, Has anything been decided about fixing this problem? Thanks. Cheers, --=20 J=E9r=F4me Marant http://marant.org