From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: michael.cadilhac@lrde.org (=?iso-8859-1?Q?Micha=EBl?= Cadilhac) Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Loading an output from prin1 (savehist bug). Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 18:00:40 +0200 Organization: Epita/LRDE Message-ID: <87bqt1dmqf.fsf@lrde.org> References: <874q07xfm5.fsf@lrde.org> <87odxoslsr.fsf@lrde.org> <8764jubadb.fsf@lrde.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="===============1445445048==" X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1149955472 30716 80.91.229.2 (10 Jun 2006 16:04:32 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 10 Jun 2006 16:04:32 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Jun 10 18:03:34 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp5vq-0004BD-0y for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 18:03:26 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp5vp-0008Pz-Fu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:03:25 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp5tF-0007Tc-9T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:00:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp5tC-0007Sc-KZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:00:44 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Fp5tB-0007SL-Oi for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:00:41 -0400 Original-Received: from [62.39.139.2] (helo=kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA:32) (Exim 4.52) id 1Fp61R-00011P-58; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 12:09:13 -0400 Original-Received: from mahaena.lrde.epita.fr ([192.168.101.66] helo=mahaena.lrde) by kualalumpur.lrde.epita.fr with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1Fp5t5-00078P-Eb; Sat, 10 Jun 2006 18:00:35 +0200 Original-To: rms@gnu.org Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAElBMVEVWPh+Tai+5r5YKBAEU CQQzGAtiq7gjAAACR0lEQVQ4jW2UzW7lIAyFzVW8BzTZX5DmCZLuU2H2pMXv/ypzbK7aSh2kRCRf /HNsE0q7Sg+RQ7JFKaqtrRNAl5AIIKe6D5DBqgbmUAe5hBI1wIRFAHjeM0RKtZi7XVVEpb0BSNfA IddChChT5DildSLWOWhY5IEItMnncZgFcUAc/5jjwCMsDosRNdfKPDTFEdVBW8C+RebDb4N5Orio RhM1+11IJyx0ng2+LryFHBMPDQDYHrY6IfGuU3ouiXTQNE8LIJDKOWpNxERTFrggQwRPd7USUsTW fJ0XbR3bdj5KgBYy4SACpxDeUYEUAzLmtJ1iIrD2gczPq8Qomjhsh/RjGIgKIO8p7NITjwlx7WID nsnQe5NeuTvoBpi8LX6vLLOh5icjOHqBypgnuSp7M+RE1agbQKHQr5E2z1WObhYW4gMqeGQL7joM jCf2DxSk5ApADSYHfFF4igNfJZL1z0GKP0FN02s4XiDXr7V5P94W6I9v8MfBOQDmfwAaVYt+x8Da v4DJvX8BAdin3Knm5yMZYAO4ABDkDniZLLfi4P40gP1F0TPGZOu0CGwA1lcowxwlGy6A9705mD0V jHCxwVZT/hYdRJVUGZNlx6l7ScQBTluof6Wj6bsPYlvpwoTvXFD9gHPn2TZPF3ntI2ecxVrW5MrV XiCie5EeNa7BlWu/HNSkprDUva163PHxAv5jyGV7gVzyAghSKOTnat85UIYFICXbD2NV9rRiv0BS tKQsg6OHH4A15F1WW+UHKHHa32h6aPnAm3/pUcWp+WYnTQAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Thu, 25 May 2006 22:21:34 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110006 (No Gnus v0.6) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:55812 Archived-At: --===============1445445048== Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Richard Stallman writes: > Does this restriction have to be put in the coding style section of > the manual? > > I think it should go in the place where `interactive' is documented. Is this done? I couldn't do it since I wasn't aware of the other restrictions (regarding those interactive arguments) that have to be made. We pointed out that the use of a marker is harmful, but what about (this is a grep) the following: # # # # # #