From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Copying preserves font-lock-face Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:02:19 -0400 Message-ID: <87bqp37ggk.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <17684.33575.513181.276604@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <45155CE0.6040200@gmx.at> <17686.8709.23521.874061@kahikatea.snap.net.nz> <4516532E.8040906@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1159221668 14030 80.91.229.2 (25 Sep 2006 22:01:08 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 25 Sep 2006 22:01:08 +0000 (UTC) Cc: martin rudalics , nickrob@snap.net.nz, emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Sep 26 00:01:04 2006 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRyV0-0001Mu-HX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:00:27 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRyV0-0002qx-8K for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:00:26 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GRyUq-0002qn-LN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:00:16 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1GRyUo-0002qT-QL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:00:15 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1GRyUo-0002qN-N7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:00:14 -0400 Original-Received: from [18.19.1.138] (helo=cyd) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.52) id 1GRyZI-0002JC-TT; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:04:53 -0400 Original-Received: by cyd (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 420584E3E1; Mon, 25 Sep 2006 18:02:19 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: rms@gnu.org In-Reply-To: (Richard Stallman's message of "Sun\, 24 Sep 2006 23\:17\:29 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:60217 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > So I guess we need to get rid of `font-lock-face' properties when > yanking, at least usually. Sounds OK to me. > However, in buffers where all faces are assigned "manually", perhaps > we should instead convert them to `face' properties. Such modes can probably manipulate yank-excluded-properties if necessary. I don't know of any mode where getting rid of the font-lock-face would be wrong.