From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: dVCS vs. CVS Date: Mon, 07 Jan 2008 22:33:20 +0000 Message-ID: <87bq7x5kr3.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> References: <87y7b36ojw.fsf@bzg.ath.cx> <87prwd7j8l.GNU's_Not_Unix!%yavor@gnu.org> <857iilbozs.fsf@lola.goethe.zz> <87fxx9thzm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1199745221 23440 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2008 22:33:41 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:33:41 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 07 23:34:02 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JC0Xf-0003qR-Ik for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 23:33:59 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JC0XI-0004aN-ER for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:33:36 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JC0XD-0004Zk-L8 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:33:31 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JC0XB-0004ZH-0T for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:33:30 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JC0XA-0004ZE-QZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:33:28 -0500 Original-Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.187]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JC0XA-0008IS-Fe for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 17:33:28 -0500 Original-Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 26so9521094fkx.10 for ; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:33:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:received:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; bh=AGKtJhiJf1ATR6P3JMAbi73GtS1a+0hj0RWe3NgL11M=; b=qMq5r/Ske84AnTeAOvEV/bDH9lPxiWsDpNon6z1Jh/uO3pSKrAQV/bqeyCEaPpqNrBYbKXBXazOq2Bxdo97YoXgtD1Mx2zVjgWd5v2DLtvI3yGOOYmPRYXWC3oDq5t/FlK3BozGk8SGOgsAL4lsJ6np/FX1KkWolmEJqS3KqAWk= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id:mime-version:content-type:sender; b=AJuQQdIHVWRczjvVqxxds5foE1l78nvXlP0U1t9oD6a0f1FOZYxqu3eHvTRML4a7jLPrPgBT2oQPSuUtBUP3jTJiGvGS2FIAdKpxApPKJRzUuIQJi2l8tvVcSChjU3gsiT6/JWnoR4Md9vf7LnDWVrTVYHePogTqA2V86NUcFqw= Original-Received: by 10.82.157.6 with SMTP id f6mr36488856bue.1.1199745203822; Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:33:23 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from bzg.ath.cx ( [81.158.232.163]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id f8sm27756306nfh.13.2008.01.07.14.33.21 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Mon, 07 Jan 2008 14:33:22 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by bzg.ath.cx (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 9101F1575A7; Mon, 7 Jan 2008 22:33:20 +0000 (GMT) In-Reply-To: <87fxx9thzm.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Tue, 08 Jan 2008 06:59:09 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110007 (No Gnus v0.7) Emacs/23.0.0 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:86526 Archived-At: "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > (No, I'm not trying to teach anybody's Grandma how to knit; probably > everybody knows this already. But I hope to contribute a wording that > both the progressives and the conservatives in this debate can use as > a common ground.) Your wording is crystal clear and very useful! -- Bastien