From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Introducing 'unrecognized and 'ignored Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:34:43 +0100 Message-ID: <87bq7fnqek.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <17EA38DF-BCC1-4565-8510-5DD10DD667E3@mac.com> <20071229114551.GD9794@thyrsus.com> <20080102021907.GA15494@thyrsus.com> <200801020445.m024jWU2008538@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801031805.m03I5SBf022748@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801050901.m0591mQj011970@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <20080105143415.GG30869@thyrsus.com> <200801061037.m06AbIRD004966@oogie-boogie.ics.uci.edu> <200801182346.m0INkiEg022130@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <200801191705.m0JH5WOU026943@sallyv1.ics.uci.edu> <87sl0tbn1m.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87myr0qlyp.fsf@ambire.localdomain> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1200929904 32638 80.91.229.12 (21 Jan 2008 15:38:24 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 21 Jan 2008 15:38:24 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 21 16:38:43 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JGyjL-0007pb-8H for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:38:36 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGyiv-00087n-KB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:38:09 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JGyhR-0007Jd-MZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:36:37 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JGyhN-0007Ho-5c for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:36:37 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JGyhM-0007Hi-S0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:36:32 -0500 Original-Received: from ppp-100-38.21-151.libero.it ([151.21.38.100] helo=ambire.localdomain) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JGyhM-00018q-Jg for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:36:32 -0500 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1JGyfb-0006KL-Dl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 21 Jan 2008 16:34:43 +0100 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:18:02 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:87215 Archived-At: () Stefan Monnier () Mon, 21 Jan 2008 10:18:02 -0500 It's reliable in that we know which buffer it is, but that doesn't mean it's the right buffer. Isn't it often a hidden buffer like *vc* rather than the vc-status buffer itself? I don't know. I tested w/ vc.el using `C-x v g' so there was no vc-status buffer. (Am i missing something?) What is the scenario where there is a vc-status buffer to worry about? The change is checked in; please try it and let me know w/ a concrete (non-hypothetical) test case, for problems you encounter. Note that the most recent change (checking liveness in then sentinel) should have nothing to do w/ the original setq mode-line-process. thi