From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs Subject: Re: 23.0.60; Defaut encoding for XML files should be undefined (instead of utf-8) Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:01:13 +0900 Message-ID: <87bq6eyf9y.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87odaifv16.fsf@mundaneum.com> <87r6fd5q12.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <47B6B3CC.1080101@gnu.org> <87wsp5xhz4.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <47B71777.6030404@gnu.org> <87pruwxmqe.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1203314083 9874 80.91.229.12 (18 Feb 2008 05:54:43 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 18 Feb 2008 05:54:43 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org, Jason Rumney , Edward O'Connor , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Miles Bader Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Feb 18 06:55:06 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1JQyxz-00063e-4q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:55:03 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQyxU-0004Om-Ih for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:54:32 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQyxN-0004Oh-CS for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:54:25 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1JQyxK-0004OV-IB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:54:24 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1JQyxK-0004OS-Bz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQyxK-0001ZM-46 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:54:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mail.gnu.org ([199.232.76.166] helo=mx10.gnu.org) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.67) (envelope-from ) id 1JQyxJ-000358-OE for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:54:21 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQyxE-0001YK-Dj for emacs-pretest-bug@gnu.org; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:54:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JQyxE-0001Xa-14; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 00:54:16 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB2F51535B3; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 14:54:11 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 51EAA1A29E5; Mon, 18 Feb 2008 15:01:14 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 7.17 under 21.5 (beta28) "fuki" 42711a251efd XEmacs Lucid X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:89443 gmane.emacs.pretest.bugs:21185 Archived-At: Miles Bader writes: > "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > > Are you calling me out? Good bye. Good luck. > > What, you cannot be wrong?! Not in this. Specifically: Mr. Rumney accused me of not understanding what was being discussed for no reason I can see, and then of not reading the thread merely because I cited the subject of the thread. This after likening standard conformance to slavery in a reply to Mr. O'Conner. I took exception to his rude behavior, I do not intend to converse with Mr. Rumney on this subject further, and I wish you all luck if that is acceptable behavior here. All matters of opinion or personal choice, and those are mine.