From: Paul R <paul.r.ml@gmail.com>
To: Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org, Miles Bader <miles@gnu.org>
Subject: Re: New global bindings
Date: Tue, 03 Jun 2008 19:35:38 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bq2ie80l.fsf@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <jwv7id6plqo.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue\, 03 Jun 2008 11\:56\:28 -0400")
Stefan Monnier <monnier@iro.umontreal.ca> writes:
> Point nb 1 is easy to fix, maybe I can live with nb 3, but nb 2 seems to
> be more problematic. So I think we need to find some other key-bindings
> for that. I think a prefix key followed by +, -, and = (repeatable like
> C-x e e e e e, maybe even allowing switching between + and -) is the
> best choice.
It is one more case where I think emacs should provide a binding of
the form C-x C-+ + + + + ...
'+' would mean "repeat last command" as long as no other key is hit.
Additionnaly, we could declare "-" as a valid candidate.
Why not :
(global-set-key-autorepeat '("\C-x\C-" . ("+" . zoom-in)
("-" . zoom-out)))
to allow auto-repeat on + and - after either C-x C-- or C-x C-+.
I'd be happy if emacs could provide a primitive for this. It could
display a transient helper in the echo area to remind what keys are
temporary bound to special functions.
Currently, I use the following code :
;;;; Auto-repeat any command by pressing last shortcut key
(defun auto-repeat-command (command)
(let ((repeat-repeat-char
(when (eq last-command-char
last-command-event)
last-command-char)))
(call-interactively command)
(while (eq (read-event) repeat-repeat-char)
;; Make each repetition undo separately.
(auto-repeat-command command)
(setq unread-command-events (list last-input-event)))))
then, for example :
(global-set-key "\C-xmn" (lambda () (interactive) (auto-repeat-command 'marker-visit-next)))
This is clearly not optimal, but it works and I have not looked for a
cleaner implementation, yet.
This type of binding is ideal for any command that :
- is not very often called
- when called, will probably be called several time in a row
They are a lot of places where such default behaviour would provide
intuitive and non-intrusive bindings.
What do you think ?
--
Paul
prev parent reply other threads:[~2008-06-03 17:35 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2008-06-03 15:56 New global bindings Stefan Monnier
2008-06-03 16:13 ` Miles Bader
2008-06-03 18:44 ` joakim
2008-06-03 23:39 ` Miles Bader
2008-06-03 16:39 ` M Jared Finder
2008-06-03 17:13 ` Drew Adams
2008-06-04 2:08 ` Miles Bader
2008-06-04 2:50 ` Miles Bader
2008-06-04 3:46 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-06-04 3:53 ` Miles Bader
2008-06-04 5:11 ` Stefan Monnier
2008-06-04 10:43 ` joakim
2008-06-04 13:30 ` Miles Bader
2008-06-04 14:35 ` Juanma Barranquero
2008-06-04 18:38 ` Stephen Berman
2008-06-03 16:55 ` Eric Hanchrow
2008-06-03 17:35 ` Paul R [this message]
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bq2ie80l.fsf@gmail.com \
--to=paul.r.ml@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=miles@gnu.org \
--cc=monnier@iro.umontreal.ca \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).