From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: moving more cl seq/mapping support into core Date: Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:12:00 -0400 Message-ID: <87bp7dehy7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <4CA52B36.6060405@gmail.com> <4CA645EA.3050403@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1285967535 5941 80.91.229.12 (1 Oct 2010 21:12:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Oct 2010 21:12:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: rms@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Daniel Colascione Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Oct 01 23:12:13 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1P1mtn-00045H-CV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 23:12:11 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46397 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1mtm-0004TN-Mk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:12:10 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=39822 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1P1mth-0004TF-8X for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:12:06 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1mtg-0001rj-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:12:05 -0400 Original-Received: from pantheon-po42.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.101]:35157) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1P1mte-0001rS-LY; Fri, 01 Oct 2010 17:12:02 -0400 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014154.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.154]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po42.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o91LC1eO001537 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:12:01 -0400 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 045CCC018; Fri, 1 Oct 2010 17:12:00 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <4CA645EA.3050403@gmail.com> (Daniel Colascione's message of "Fri, 01 Oct 2010 13:34:50 -0700") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:131193 Archived-At: Daniel Colascione writes: > I understood the primary objection to keyword arguments being about > efficiency. No; as RMS and Miles have pointed out, it's also a matter of style.