From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Wojciech Meyer Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Lexbind Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:07:09 +0000 Message-ID: <87bp19v1te.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87sjuulr20.fsf@gmail.com> <87aah2p1s1.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300399646 4441 80.91.229.12 (17 Mar 2011 22:07:26 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 17 Mar 2011 22:07:26 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Juanma Barranquero , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Mar 17 23:07:21 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0LLf-0006AX-WF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 23:07:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37084 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0LLS-0001e1-HS for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:07:02 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=43195 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q0LLH-0001YI-1K for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:06:54 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0LLD-0003gv-5n for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:06:48 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ww0-f49.google.com ([74.125.82.49]:44545) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q0LLC-0003gn-Um for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 18:06:47 -0400 Original-Received: by wwc33 with SMTP id 33so3754682wwc.30 for ; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:06:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=0adDdyP7IWr+N2BXpwgcrjR/V+tCm/JJgpv/z48Pufw=; b=IhO7GbJo+dxTe8mdJh2uf4nNPjEAhAfERh1iGOAFd1TRaGrRy4td52FV0zNb+fk3uv BRc3HIDrcQiRpRaSDJGXGRkO3FDPK6li5PIAWOV9TJqdMX+tHeiQ9V5yMZI61d+C/H3L EUq5kwAGTbeDFKZsRXdyvLiBZjhbl7g0iFRLc= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; b=uDDUTjGBRJuBir/KwpSexc+J+xmyqaivwG9rjKr9yzWmE7a0/ZVeJJ4ZDD4qP8Jyad UFipARb3+iQoE8PyOXz5megTiFDeZ4XXP6kUnvAc3aIlmrmielYJ4jmkMWMvkI4BdS9X +pNot5OkFu/kSJQCaZfZ+evv83CwuJly+0NPs= Original-Received: by 10.227.53.73 with SMTP id l9mr347403wbg.19.1300399605804; Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:06:45 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from spec-desktop.danmey.org (host86-132-223-244.range86-132.btcentralplus.com [86.132.223.244]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id b20sm919624wbb.33.2011.03.17.15.06.43 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Thu, 17 Mar 2011 15:06:44 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Thu, 17 Mar 2011 16:01:58 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Received-From: 74.125.82.49 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137377 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> I just had one while running under GDB, so I Ctrl-C and I got the >> attached backtrace. > > Hmm... the lexbind branch does not touch the redisplay code at all, so > this is perplexing. My best guess so far is that some part of the > changed C code corrupts some part of the memory, leading to the inf-loop. > > > Stefan I noticed some hang ups few days ago with a fresh update. Not only on `lexbind' branch but on `trunk' as well. I didn't try to debug it. Now I rebuilt it, with complete cleanup of repository, and it *seems* to be better. The hangup was happening usually after M-x and then Emacs was not responsive and taking significant CPU time. `pkill emacs' had seemed to interrupt the hang, but later it was happening again and `pkill emacs' was killing Emacs completely. I don't know if it is relevant to the discussion. I do have similar configuration that Juanma cited. Wojciech