From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Tassilo Horn Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: general lazy list facility for Emacs Lisp? Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:41:06 +0100 Message-ID: <87bp11604d.fsf@member.fsf.org> References: <87pqphswn3.fsf@lifelogs.com> <877hbpzsy8.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87oc51rcal.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87tyetfymt.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87pqphfyak.fsf@member.fsf.org> <87hbatfv4q.fsf@member.fsf.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1300912925 31662 80.91.229.12 (23 Mar 2011 20:42:05 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 23 Mar 2011 20:42:05 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Ted Zlatanov , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Mar 23 21:42:01 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2UsC-00059b-BG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:41:44 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:59033 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2UsB-0001i3-Je for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:41:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=48682 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q2Ure-0001Th-7E for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:41:11 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2Urd-00034Z-38 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from out3.smtp.messagingengine.com ([66.111.4.27]:37806) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q2Urc-00034V-W4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:41:09 -0400 Original-Received: from compute2.internal (compute2.nyi.mail.srv.osa [10.202.2.42]) by gateway1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2F4C207CE; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:41:08 -0400 (EDT) Original-Received: from frontend2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161]) by compute2.internal (MEProxy); Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:41:08 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=messagingengine.com; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id:mime-version:content-type; s=smtpout; bh=uZUJe2xjMLQzJnGq2rY4anESm1I=; b=c0xbHaDBQA/k9Nu62ns7vwK2sUauQFe76jNXDHCL3K7ODxGOIgNDVAmJd8p5sDYmCGneuUmTi3YRFUAdeL2UA4eBsy2xpf+Zk9Ibq8iAxlgj9o5XAVJ1Cz1uaEXHrPgAGXWehfqx8iu+ZN1aWyffIbGTuxmvithAmkeGFltp1ag= X-Sasl-enc: Rp0Xncv5Pw4WxHqIjJrapO1X+c0ZB2N7KhGgVoN/MgEf 1300912868 Original-Received: from thinkpad (88-134-173-46-dynip.superkabel.de [88.134.173.46]) by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 806EE449804; Wed, 23 Mar 2011 16:41:07 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <87hbatfv4q.fsf@member.fsf.org> (Tassilo Horn's message of "Wed, 23 Mar 2011 21:18:45 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.9999 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 66.111.4.27 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:137612 Archived-At: Tassilo Horn writes: >> You can try it out right now in the `lexbind-new' branch which is >> pretty much ready for inclusion (mostly lacks testing, and has >> currently 1 open bug apparently around eieio; additional testers are >> welcome). > > I've started compiling Compiled it. --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- (setq lexical-binding t) (let ((x 1)) (defun lex-test (y) (+ x y))) (lex-test 1) ;; ==> 2 --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Wow! :-) > and will report issues if I find one in my daily use. Found one! C-h k lexical-binding RET errors. I've reported it, but the confirmation mail has not yet arrived. > I guess, that there are many packages that won't work with > lexical-binding set to t, right? Seems to be a false assumption. At least org and Gnus are running fine. Bye, Tassilo