From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Please don't use revision numbers on commit messages (and elsewhere). Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:47:57 +0200 Message-ID: <87bp0j5ywy.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <877hbfvwyo.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87tyeivni1.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87k4fevkc1.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87zko6rn8y.fsf@thysbe.localdomain> <87r59g4dne.fsf@ambire.localdomain> <87hbacqeba.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302094128 13953 80.91.229.12 (6 Apr 2011 12:48:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 6 Apr 2011 12:48:48 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 06 14:48:45 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7SA7-0004pU-Sa for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:48:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:43654 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7SA7-0008S2-1G for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:48:43 -0400 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=56731 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1Q7S9p-0008Ft-KE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:48:26 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7S9o-0001aZ-Lh for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:48:25 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp204.alice.it ([82.57.200.100]:38688) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7S9o-0001aF-B3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 08:48:24 -0400 Original-Received: from ambire.localdomain (95.245.72.89) by smtp204.alice.it (8.5.124.08) id 4D7E0F6401F7B4EF for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 6 Apr 2011 14:48:22 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Q7S9N-00073F-Nz for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 06 Apr 2011 14:47:57 +0200 In-Reply-To: <87hbacqeba.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> (Stephen J. Turnbull's message of "Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:55:05 +0900") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.100 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138230 Archived-At: () "Stephen J. Turnbull" () Wed, 06 Apr 2011 11:55:05 +0900 Stefan Monnier writes: > I'm not sure I agree. But it's vacuously true! Yes, if the surrounding control operator is =E2=80=98and=E2=80=99. The acc= umulating nature (outer form) of mailing list threads might suggest that it is =E2=80=98and=E2=80=99, but the substance (inner form) is often =E2=80=98or= =E2=80=99, as in this case: The intent was originally to comment on the unsuitability of date-only disambiguation in the face of push races, but then i realized (after having goofed twice) that date of commit and date of authorship being different can indeed provide a toe-grip. Sorry for the noise; back to the grind...