From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] GnuTLS support on Woe32 Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:46:58 -0500 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87bp072fb1.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87ipvwl1nx.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87ei6bunxz.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <83tyf6rhgn.fsf@gnu.org> <84zkoy6tah.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87hbb5a4xq.fsf@lifelogs.com> <84ipvkx1da.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87d3ls7n3b.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87vczdwjuk.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <87k4fr3koi.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aagn2tpr.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrjquacf.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87lj05svwh.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87bp11imgb.wl%claudio.bley@gmail.com> <8739mc5nes.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87ipuubao6.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87fwpjfkkz.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1302914853 26256 80.91.229.12 (16 Apr 2011 00:47:33 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Apr 2011 00:47:33 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 16 02:47:29 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QAtfT-0007Ul-QG for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 02:47:19 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:40664 helo=lists2.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAtfT-0004f1-C1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:47:19 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:44902) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAtfR-0004es-7F for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:47:18 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAtfQ-0002s8-CJ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:47:17 -0400 Original-Received: from lo.gmane.org ([80.91.229.12]:59523) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QAtfQ-0002s4-4r for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 15 Apr 2011 20:47:16 -0400 Original-Received: from list by lo.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QAtfI-0007Ld-Re for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 02:47:08 +0200 Original-Received: from 38.98.147.130 ([38.98.147.130]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 02:47:08 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by 38.98.147.130 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Sat, 16 Apr 2011 02:47:08 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 13 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 38.98.147.130 X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" User-Agent: Gnus/5.110016 (No Gnus v0.16) Emacs/24.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:sGMy8zaojobfCBH2C8nDoMo7nfo= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 80.91.229.12 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:138511 Archived-At: On Fri, 15 Apr 2011 19:58:05 -0400 Richard Stallman wrote: RS> Have you asked Claudio to write to assign@gnu.org to try to speed this RS> up? That is what you should do any time there is a delay caused by RS> papers. Don't moan uselessly; take action that might help. I haven't heard back, though I've sent several e-mails to Claudio. The best I can do is split the patch between my work and his. I'd really hate to do that because he added W32 support that is badly needed (W32 is where most of the TLS issues with Gnus happen). I'd rewrite his work but it's rude. Ted