From: Jeremiah Dodds <jeremiah.dodds@gmail.com>
To: "T.V. Raman" <tv.raman.tv@gmail.com>
Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Subject: Re: list-packages: Marking packages as "uninteresting"?
Date: Thu, 17 May 2012 10:23:47 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <87bolmj37w.fsf@destructor.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CADkJX2jFEDgWW6+86iJfF_uK-aS7zKHhuoeoozb84UeDSVKkDg@mail.gmail.com> (T. V. Raman's message of "Wed, 9 May 2012 10:42:35 -0700")
"T.V. Raman" <tv.raman.tv@gmail.com> writes:
> This is mostly a simple feature request:
>
> Right now list-packages presents a giant list of packages, with
> available packages listed first -- followed by all the installed
> packages.
>
> This also means that every time you bring it up, you end up
> looking through packages you've decided are not interesting to
> you --- would be possible to add the ability to mark packages as
> "uninteresting" and have them bubble down to the bottom of the
> list? They'd always be available in the packages buffer and you
> could even find them with isearch -- they'd just not clutter up
> the list and make it possibly to see what new packages have
> shown up.
I'd personally much rather see efforts put toward collapsible package
categorization than simple filtering. If you wanted to go that route
though, there are existing emacs packages that have similar behavior,
gnus off the top of my head.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-17 14:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-09 17:42 list-packages: Marking packages as "uninteresting"? T.V. Raman
2012-05-17 14:23 ` Jeremiah Dodds [this message]
2012-05-17 15:38 ` Stefan Monnier
2012-05-21 2:37 ` Tim Cross
2012-05-22 8:00 ` T.V. Raman
2012-05-22 12:56 ` Jambunathan K
2012-05-22 16:24 ` list-packages: Marking packages as Isaac
2012-05-24 13:11 ` list-packages: Marking packages as "uninteresting"? T.V. Raman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
List information: https://www.gnu.org/software/emacs/
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=87bolmj37w.fsf@destructor.i-did-not-set--mail-host-address--so-tickle-me \
--to=jeremiah.dodds@gmail.com \
--cc=emacs-devel@gnu.org \
--cc=tv.raman.tv@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
Code repositories for project(s) associated with this public inbox
https://git.savannah.gnu.org/cgit/emacs.git
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for read-only IMAP folder(s) and NNTP newsgroup(s).