From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Kenichi Handa Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Feature freeze on October 1 Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 22:57:35 +0900 Message-ID: <87bogsanu8.fsf@gnu.org> References: <833926i82o.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1348667895 23774 80.91.229.3 (26 Sep 2012 13:58:15 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2012 13:58:15 +0000 (UTC) Cc: cyd@gnu.org, monnier@IRO.UMontreal.CA, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Sep 26 15:58:19 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TGs7z-00052l-U8 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 15:58:16 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:39871 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGs7u-00042M-BB for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:58:10 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:50066) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGs7p-00042H-1S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:58:08 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGs7j-0003Op-D9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:58:04 -0400 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([208.118.235.10]:54261) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGs7j-0003Oj-9B for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:57:59 -0400 Original-Received: from 253.240.accsnet.ne.jp ([202.220.240.253]:53002 helo=mongkok) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TGs7i-0007Gb-3K; Wed, 26 Sep 2012 09:57:58 -0400 In-Reply-To: <833926i82o.fsf@gnu.org> (message from Eli Zaretskii on Tue, 25 Sep 2012 14:46:23 +0200) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 208.118.235.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:153584 Archived-At: In article <833926i82o.fsf@gnu.org>, Eli Zaretskii writes: > > #define CHAR_STRING_ADVANCE_NO_UNIFY CHAR_STRING_ADVANCE > > #define STRING_CHAR_ADVANCE_NO_UNIFY STRING_CHAR_ADVANCE > > > > Then we won't forget that callers expect non-unify versions. > Done as trunk revision 110196. Thank you! By the way, I vaguely remember that some workaround code was added to avoid the buffer relocation problem. Do you remember where was it? Or, is it just my false memory? --- Kenichi Handa handa@gnu.org