From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Pascal J. Bourguignon" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Modern Conventions for Emacs Lisp files? Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:06:22 +0200 Organization: Informatimago Message-ID: <87bo9mdx3l.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> References: <87hajhswdh.fsf@gmail.com> <8738v0fxw7.fsf@kuiper.lan.informatimago.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1365620802 16462 80.91.229.3 (10 Apr 2013 19:06:42 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2013 19:06:42 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Apr 10 21:06:45 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ0M1-0008GB-1x for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:06:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:37302 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ0M0-00072Z-JM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:06:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:38912) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ0Lv-000720-UL for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:06:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ0Lu-0006fa-Ex for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:06:39 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:34681) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ0Lu-0006fI-8M for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 15:06:38 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UQ0Ln-00081J-JQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:06:31 +0200 Original-Received: from amontsouris-651-1-192-178.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr ([82.123.191.178]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:06:31 +0200 Original-Received: from pjb by amontsouris-651-1-192-178.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 10 Apr 2013 21:06:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 12 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: amontsouris-651-1-192-178.w82-123.abo.wanadoo.fr Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwAQMAAABtzGvEAAAABlBMVEUAAAD///+l2Z/dAAAA oElEQVR4nK3OsRHCMAwF0O8YQufUNIQRGIAja9CxSA55AxZgFO4coMgYrEDDQZWPIlNAjwq9 033pbOBPtbXuB6PKNBn5gZkhGa86Z4x2wE67O+06WxGD/HCOGR0deY3f9Ijwwt7rNGNf6Oac l/GuZTF1wFGKiYYHKSFAkjIo1b6sCYS1sVmFhhhahKQssRjRT90ITWUk6vvK3RsPGs+M1RuR mV+hO/VvFAAAAABJRU5ErkJggg== X-Accept-Language: fr, es, en User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:ZWM0YTc1M2FmYTkyNjFiNmUxYTM2ZjAxMzQ5ZWQ2ZTZmNGExMzQ1MA== X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:158828 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: >> But the lisp convention is the opposite: > > Right, that's because Lisp didn't think it through. > Luckily, we're only dealing with Elisp, I think it was thought through: don't use more than four levels! -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}.