From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to test whether any code runs after same command invocation? Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 13:25:27 +0100 Message-ID: <87bny88sw8.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: <87eh36kl1f.fsf@web.de> <87d2ip91gp.fsf@web.de> <87fvnl8rlh.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <878utcd5n0.fsf@web.de> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1392466917 396 80.91.229.3 (15 Feb 2014 12:21:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 15 Feb 2014 12:21:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Michael Heerdegen Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Feb 15 13:22:05 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1WEeFw-0005pX-Vx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 13:22:05 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55998 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WEeFw-0004qF-GV for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 07:22:04 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:48471) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WEeFm-0004f4-Cd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 07:22:01 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WEeFf-00082a-2W for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 07:21:54 -0500 Original-Received: from smtp205.alice.it ([82.57.200.101]:23661) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1WEeFe-00082Q-NC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 07:21:46 -0500 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (95.244.64.35) by smtp205.alice.it (8.6.060.28) id 529A59311212FC24; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 13:21:45 +0100 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1WEeJP-00039X-G5; Sat, 15 Feb 2014 13:25:39 +0100 Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org In-Reply-To: <878utcd5n0.fsf@web.de> (Michael Heerdegen's message of "Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:36:35 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.101 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:169638 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () Michael Heerdegen () Sat, 15 Feb 2014 11:36:35 +0100 > Another way to be lazy is to do nothing if there is pending input. Yes, but that approach doesn't help in my case. Oops, sorry for the noise. > BTW, this should probably be on help-gnu-emacs. Thanks, I wasn't sure about that. I thought questions about developing Emacs addons fit here, but emacs-dev is only about developing vanilla Emacs itself, right? Sorry, then. No worries. In this case i suppose the issue pertains to both just fine. IMHO, it's nicer to see a solution using existing facilities on help-, and one using new facilities (or conventions) on -devel, but if in the end everyone who reads one reads the other, there is distinction not in substance, only in style. =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) (not (via 'mailing-list))) =3D> nil --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlL/XLsACgkQZwMiJEyAdQIiVgCZAUfMbZ2oMDQI8SNm4haO9XVv XTEAoKesnPX1WNuD3Ad2/XukaI30x83A =wKFo -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--