From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: trunk r117969: Font-lock `cl-flet*', too. Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:41:13 +0200 Message-ID: <87bnpz981y.fsf@zigzag.favinet> References: Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature" X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1411911472 7611 80.91.229.3 (28 Sep 2014 13:37:52 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sun, 28 Sep 2014 13:37:52 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Liu Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sun Sep 28 15:37:45 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XYEfY-00042Q-1Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:37:44 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:59851 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYEfX-00038s-N3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:37:43 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:43488) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYEfO-00038m-Fq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:37:41 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYEfG-0008E4-W7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:37:34 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp207.alice.it ([82.57.200.103]:8306) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XYEfG-00086j-LA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 09:37:26 -0400 Original-Received: from zigzag.favinet (95.236.70.8) by smtp207.alice.it (8.6.060.43) id 540DA2C40478E3B0; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:37:18 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by zigzag.favinet with local (Exim 4.80) (envelope-from ) id 1XYEj6-0007D4-0G; Sun, 28 Sep 2014 15:41:24 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Leo Liu's message of "Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:13:38 +0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.4.50 (gnu/linux) Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 82.57.200.103 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:174769 Archived-At: --=-=-= Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable () Leo Liu () Sun, 28 Sep 2014 16:13:38 +0800 I noted this problem some time ago but decided not to fontify it so that this nonstandard macro doesn't get much use. It's hard to judge the efficacy of such subtle negative feedback. cl-flet* should probably be removed. Common lisp doesn't have this macro. Personally I prefer cl-labels when needing something like cl-flet*. Thanks for the tip (i am ignorant of most things Common Lisp). I think until the time =E2=80=98cl-flet*=E2=80=99 is truly removed from Ema= cs, there is no harm in it being fontified like the others, but if you think otherwise and are willing to start the process for its eventual removal, feel free to revert the change. [cc added] =2D-=20 Thien-Thi Nguyen GPG key: 4C807502 (if you're human and you know it) read my lisp: (responsep (questions 'technical) (not (via 'mailing-list))) =3D> nil --=-=-= Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.12 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAlQoD/0ACgkQZwMiJEyAdQLiHQCdH4iy+KuuIbL7EmVjaGTS1Pmv aKUAnioOPAHyNwlNgA+eo4CgMS8yQUw6 =cs6T -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --=-=-=--