From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Mark H Weaver Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs Lisp's future Date: Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:00:55 -0400 Message-ID: <87bnpoerbs.fsf@netris.org> References: <54193A70.9020901@member.fsf.org> <87wq8pwjen.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <837g0ptnlj.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3yxwdr6.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87tx3tmi3t.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <834mvttgsf.fsf@gnu.org> <87lhp5m99w.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87h9ztm5oa.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87d2ahm3nw.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <871tqneyvl.fsf@netris.org> <87d2a54t1m.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <83lhotme1e.fsf@gnu.org> <871tql17uw.fsf@yeeloong.lan> <838uktm9gw.fsf@gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1412636514 14492 80.91.229.3 (6 Oct 2014 23:01:54 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 6 Oct 2014 23:01:54 +0000 (UTC) Cc: dak@gnu.org, rms@gnu.org, dmantipov@yandex.ru, emacs-devel@gnu.org, handa@gnu.org, Eli Zaretskii , stephen@xemacs.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 07 01:01:42 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1XbHHg-0004gl-6W for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 07 Oct 2014 01:01:40 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:55075 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbHHf-000346-Ta for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:01:39 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:46125) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbHHJ-00033W-W0 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:01:23 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbHHE-0001kU-3S for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:01:17 -0400 Original-Received: from world.peace.net ([96.39.62.75]:56939) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1XbHH7-0001jt-QZ; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:01:05 -0400 Original-Received: from c-24-62-95-23.hsd1.ma.comcast.net ([24.62.95.23] helo=jojen) by world.peace.net with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1XbHH0-0007GF-RU; Mon, 06 Oct 2014 19:00:59 -0400 In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Mon, 06 Oct 2014 14:04:52 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.3.94 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6.x X-Received-From: 96.39.62.75 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:175055 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Please, could you move this discussion elsewhere. While I understand > the Guile developers might want to try and reuse either Emacs's code > or at least its design and expertise, this discussion is about Guile, > not about Emacs, I think this is false. This discussion, initiated by Richard, is about how Guile can adapt itself to better meet the needs of Emacs. If the discussion happens where very few Emacs users/developers are present, then I don't see how it can be useful. Mark