From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Lars Ingebrigtsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: HTML-Info design Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:48:14 +0100 Message-ID: <87bnmmag0h.fsf@building.gnus.org> References: <83y4pzptpx.fsf@gnu.org> <871tnr1gqo.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <83bnmvowdb.fsf@gnu.org> <83ppbanqhe.fsf@gnu.org> <87vbl2xigp.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <83ioh2nlow.fsf@gnu.org> <87sig6xech.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <83fvc5ni0u.fsf@gnu.org> <87k31fwwyv.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <87bnmq9ibf.fsf@ferrier.me.uk> <87lhlrx5fc.fsf@building.gnus.org> <878uhrcr5l.fsf@building.gnus.org> <83sifzjflk.fsf@gnu.org> <868uhqhq3g.fsf@dod.no> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1419850158 8044 80.91.229.3 (29 Dec 2014 10:49:18 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 29 Dec 2014 10:49:18 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Dec 29 11:49:11 2014 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5Xst-0006HQ-2j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:49:11 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:32881 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5Xss-0008Gx-9n for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 05:49:10 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52575) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5XsQ-0008BH-Pl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 05:48:43 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5XsL-0006Qq-QM for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 05:48:42 -0500 Original-Received: from hermes.netfonds.no ([80.91.224.195]:48915) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5XsL-0006Ql-Jx for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 05:48:37 -0500 Original-Received: from 2.150.68.69.tmi.telenormobil.no ([2.150.68.69] helo=building.gnus.org) by hermes.netfonds.no with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.72) (envelope-from ) id 1Y5Xs1-0004oa-Bm for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 29 Dec 2014 11:48:17 +0100 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwBAMAAAClLOS0AAAAMFBMVEVHicja5eT///7///9M jspNjbx0epFilcZimMyrq7YLDQ5BdrExPFpDh8dWlMlWltBDJEBgAAABWElEQVQ4jcXUL27DMBQG cIPSgSQo0C4azS4wENyRBVWKNGKpUunU3aBBm5JIld4FBnKFaheYCnqBsWGPFi17z//mJC0a2Kcq qb+fHYNYYTcXwv4bhBtk+uegjgF4nDb8OuKpSGshLOxWACBXIOVOSsBLYyESQkQi5hEXHP8KPrcg ARpck0I93DyLAHAX4OnDCIRLLILMWbYZ5MneE5btKW8fo7QaJrWFScsMBIXPFcKwnM3yPL9lzMGR yvw3LNFwHLYUDcdJbQAfbEe9Sf6pwU2/632UUgQ0fxHUff+tgXr11U9h2lu4zxdK+e5UVS+0iQZl AUsbA7iAnlUFeSYolYZTCNuNA1UNe4JiAlvzaotyBO6dF3oJHgM/24OVMI8GyhAUFsWy1aAXmXux 1Mdp39pzFeZA8XAI8t51HYIfd2EQurP5M7zKtZQriRnDei0PhARwNsnFL8MPu3QqLeJkL3kAAAAA SUVORK5CYII= X-Now-Playing: burn's _304 (Moon Base Big)_: "Wire!Red_Barked_Tree!01-Please_Take" In-Reply-To: <868uhqhq3g.fsf@dod.no> (Steinar Bang's message of "Mon, 29 Dec 2014 08:28:35 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.130012 (Ma Gnus v0.12) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-MailScanner-ID: 1Y5Xs1-0004oa-Bm MailScanner-NULL-Check: 1420454899.48984@fo7LVr59iGicz6yPFgDIpg X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.224.195 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:180804 Archived-At: Steinar Bang writes: > I'm less sure about the rest. The screen shot Lars sent seemed to have > some very bad font choices, but I don't know if emacs is to blame for > that? We know that Emacs often makes unfortunate choices, so we know that using a mixture of fonts in buffers usually makes the buffers look pretty unreadable. So it's our fault. We should either stop doing stuff like that, or we should start recommending font sets that will give us better-looking buffers. I went with the former in eww. -- (domestic pets only, the antidote for overdose, milk.) bloggy blog http://lars.ingebrigtsen.no/