From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.ciao.gmane.io!not-for-mail From: Alex =?utf-8?Q?Benn=C3=A9e?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Where is the eln search path defined Date: Mon, 25 May 2020 15:13:21 +0100 Message-ID: <87blmcrtku.fsf@linaro.org> References: <87v9kxd18j.fsf@linaro.org> <873681cdzc.fsf@linaro.org> <87sgg0c2ve.fsf@linaro.org> <87h7we9680.fsf@linaro.org> <87eeri8y4r.fsf@linaro.org> <871rnhl1n5.fsf@linaro.org> <87mu65jj6d.fsf@linaro.org> <87eergi4z2.fsf@linaro.org> <87tv0bhiwv.fsf@linaro.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="ciao.gmane.io:159.69.161.202"; logging-data="34251"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: mu4e 1.4.6; emacs 28.0.50 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andrea Corallo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Mon May 25 16:16:25 2020 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1jdDtw-0008pC-SX for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 16:16:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:49456 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdDtv-0006cB-V3 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 10:16:23 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:47874) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdDr6-00047m-FQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 10:13:29 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ed1-x52b.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::52b]:34483) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jdDr4-0005Ri-K6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 25 May 2020 10:13:27 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-ed1-x52b.google.com with SMTP id i16so15142218edv.1 for ; Mon, 25 May 2020 07:13:25 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=linaro.org; s=google; h=references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:date :message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=btU16xZZ4Ya+EwLXx2qwOsvuHugcjiZQXfUvLbWYghM=; b=XrglEuRNzwnJYH9ODPga0WHOnKJb5PYKlPY2rUxaGzU9EO1y3T0JKSidzP97oRMj+m A7aaYtbG7gTeDzmeNQpmvlwfD3cD2WtdNKMXYiFKgTpzKxdOa6HXzpjsLz2pcyTnI0za SHG6qATRTPtrIMmmSrDS+sr0dkfe8qenGHvMRs5zNwYjmunODgDLq2x+3Ci4fj5VrjUT iHBrM6YkvSlULsnXGl0t6Ukmc619HXmyXki2vg+Db+W5Ti/qT1Iieh+5QYM2/suBHIBY Pmk2QnYL3NVZ6UCsxTGaEQfltq/mcF9g/6iK8vfaKzxWCwURNixhSu1vkKV1pE0A0Tt3 6IKQ== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:references:user-agent:from:to:cc:subject :in-reply-to:date:message-id:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=btU16xZZ4Ya+EwLXx2qwOsvuHugcjiZQXfUvLbWYghM=; b=YQHcJPMVz270SMRQnAZ/4cCyuuTkiHn9vAuTjQfm8V4Gq8zvDUP8XbhteIHsuCzacH 3QBG5EF50O3QFmAQmL7dFg4kIk0VgXZ30kCh/ZoWHyJDzyE/Ye76kDY6wyHi6UvzeMV4 hJkgRrQVUDR0GxHbAFi9GDsIdMWmJLQZbWyhY4RdkN1vX7XDb49F3hi1ZagFkEeoxhX0 bJ4d02UXvqxjqlR3C0xB+dJXvN1/dOQBsRedDkYJrMxg45QtdsbXYxZGWK/Rj9WaDoi5 ao4oEpNgESoX5BUJSwdatTft14xzAIMWiyxY6wFrHRagSr4dCBTbxzuzQ+nEC1XwRibZ YFTA== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM530mu77fPhnhokGD997vvMXj0IQj3N9V3iop5aBGiRIiDl1+VIMe Fmx4LxLWpZeOnb0d05W+0KAC3p47uPc= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJz0FCuG5HWarzegkZagvJEuBWXjUN4RRfTnyzfv/SxyEzK5pArO6ILSUE8AfZMZKmyljVj10g== X-Received: by 2002:a05:6402:206f:: with SMTP id bd15mr16259013edb.3.1590416003490; Mon, 25 May 2020 07:13:23 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zen.linaroharston ([51.148.130.216]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id e9sm16652041edl.25.2020.05.25.07.13.22 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Mon, 25 May 2020 07:13:22 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from zen (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zen.linaroharston (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7A64E1FF7E; Mon, 25 May 2020 15:13:21 +0100 (BST) In-reply-to: Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::52b; envelope-from=alex.bennee@linaro.org; helo=mail-ed1-x52b.google.com X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: No matching host in p0f cache. That's all we know. X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001 autolearn=_AUTOLEARN X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:251361 Archived-At: Andrea Corallo writes: > Alex Benn=C3=A9e writes: > >> Andrea Corallo writes: >> >>> Andrea Corallo writes: >>> >> |----------------+----------------+------------+---------+------------= -+-----------------| >> | total | 130.97 | 7.81 | 5 | 138.78= | 7.21 | > > Does that means that we are observing a 15x perf uplift? > > What's the uarch are we looking at? > > Simple uarch usually benefit more, 15x is a lot tho. I've recently updated the host OS to the latest Ubuntu LTS so I was trying to gather details with the system emacs for comparison: "GNU Emacs 26.3 (build 2, aarch64-unknown-linux-gnu) of 2020-03-26, modified by Debian" But I don't seem to be able to get through one iteration. Could it be a .elc breakage between 26 and master or something else? Compiling... /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/pid= igits.el Compiling /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/pidigi= ts.el...done Wrote /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/pidigits.e= lc Loading /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/pidigits= .elc...done Loading /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/bubble-n= o-cons...done Loading /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/bubble..= .done Loading /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/dhryston= e...done Loading /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/fibn-rec= ...done Loading /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/fibn-tc.= ..done Loading /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/fibn...d= one Loading /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/inclist.= ..done Loading /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/listlen-= tc...done Loading /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/nbody...= done Loading /home/alex/.emacs.d/elpa/elisp-benchmarks-1.5/benchmarks/pidigits= ...done Iteration number: 1 Running bubble-no-cons... Running bubble... Running dhrystone... Running fibn-rec... Running fibn-tc... Running fibn... Running inclist... Running listlen-tc... Re-entering top level after C stack overflow I've tried various combinations of: (setq max-specpdl-size 650) (setq max-lisp-eval-depth 400) but I'm mainly just guessing without any concrete idea of what numbers I should be going for. Any ideas? --=20 Alex Benn=C3=A9e