unofficial mirror of 
 help / color / mirror / code / Atom feed
From: James N. V. Cash <>
To: Lars Ingebrigtsen <>
Cc: ,
Subject: Re: [PATCH] avoid hard-coded assumptions in image scaling
Date: Sun, 02 May 2021 16:56:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <>

Lars Ingebrigtsen <> writes:

> The point of the heuristic here is that we want to scale images up on
> HiDPI screens, so the current code gives me a scaling factor of 2.3.
> (I've got a 14" 4K screen.)

Oh, okay, that makes sense! I'm trying to track down why I've been
seeing unexpected svg rendering issues on a 4k screen and came across
this in the process.

Sorry for the incorrect patch then!

      reply	other threads:[~2021-05-02 20:56 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-05-02 20:18 James N. V. Cash
2021-05-02 20:51 ` Lars Ingebrigtsen
2021-05-02 20:56   ` James N. V. Cash [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:

  List information:

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \ \ \ \ \
    --subject='Re: [PATCH] avoid hard-coded assumptions in image scaling' \

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link

Code repositories for project(s) associated with this inbox:

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).