From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: =?utf-8?B?Sm/Do28gVMOhdm9yYQ==?= Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] (icomplete-vertical-mode): Add support for affixations and, annotations Date: Tue, 25 May 2021 10:25:46 +0100 Message-ID: <87bl8zgo6d.fsf@gmail.com> References: <87zgwlb4xc.fsf@gmail.com> <617d06ca-27bf-2ae8-26eb-1042123499d3@daniel-mendler.de> <87pmxhb1rs.fsf@gmail.com> <23510125-37b9-e87e-3590-5322f44772ce@daniel-mendler.de> <87a6olazff.fsf@gmail.com> <93d2cfe9-bae8-bf94-486f-7569aa31491d@daniel-mendler.de> <87bl8zivzj.fsf@gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="20124"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/28.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Juri Linkov , Stefan Monnier , "emacs-devel@gnu.org" To: Daniel Mendler Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Tue May 25 11:27:07 2021 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1llTL9-0004zh-QC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 11:27:07 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41106 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llTL8-0005Lj-Mx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 05:27:06 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:35060) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llTJv-0003zQ-MN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 05:25:51 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-wr1-x429.google.com ([2a00:1450:4864:20::429]:45001) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1llTJt-0003bz-OG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 May 2021 05:25:51 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-wr1-x429.google.com with SMTP id i17so31389300wrq.11 for ; Tue, 25 May 2021 02:25:49 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ko4OtyKi+e1fMYjjn+lYYoOqCT7BZ8B1gOQ7BMV8iMQ=; b=BZ0Wh//XnDgzTYl6e4hSOmecyQlSPCCI57hHvF9gJcMOsS+ZdIG3vVzdy4b7zIla1G PKfdO47Sa0a9nCWFptUjB+lHC4d3/afFdCzrvUbTGE+DQeW8EJyDi0lBjw/gvZoqvcYT mB9MFS8O9VA1UW4GWrEprlnU9XWWzkiQdzW9YwYEylWftvMqO9W+2YIyQI7MX1300w+f dzA38w7JhbhzD3iNQr18bvxYYOZJvV7S/qvUT1X11A87DcBtpINlsBk1V0qwBcZRsNjW qkiDP4yeo2va0OJ5JBja1bCqb6kTKAz7PXBrf+m2OMXcSCxvS8/L2HJQZoOdlUJbSHVj g9dA== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:to:cc:subject:references:date:in-reply-to :message-id:user-agent:mime-version:content-transfer-encoding; bh=ko4OtyKi+e1fMYjjn+lYYoOqCT7BZ8B1gOQ7BMV8iMQ=; b=DzfTNQJFnUfM31ClzfU78AMVvsaHROzBkAjmNLCly9lYh/u2BXJyA/0vp41PN6ibLx z9ZMDTCRGgU9TJ2HYQjDOo8T3oX9dLn2t8wlZa4n9drqAAN5uczgBywYAl/FrvnyW81D qbLkyF9rd9CvTVhg1Pjn8JAE0vjNLJb6k6ht/QzqgqYMbgYu6K/giPnf15nASm4MJ5T/ kWIlEhv5OclocrLcjbivyaE9t73RV/MqpHkQX8wPJ4vzmsxFbMWEoPJaHC1b1X6eUB9s 1vuofaQbalDpf6u7gE81EUXj1ewPisAeuiiDEcXdcLYbYjydekyuj64g4QBG8jNUjHpu 9a8w== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM5331tB5WGgzZKAq3mVBDORdGijriqE6Kwh34CXryJ9dN0WF6gJ/j WZfLoglOLM/vEiwcKbXvBRA= X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJx1VwLAnSbMwA/Ej+Cwen+3UbjPKUDWDmjLm7MeJMbPefrIzxx9KO7JokT5REoCHo9lxf4N1Q== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:4304:: with SMTP id h4mr27095373wrq.210.1621934748199; Tue, 25 May 2021 02:25:48 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from krug (a94-133-55-152.cpe.netcabo.pt. [94.133.55.152]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id r7sm2041759wmq.3.2021.05.25.02.25.47 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Tue, 25 May 2021 02:25:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: (Daniel Mendler's message of "Tue, 25 May 2021 05:12:15 +0200") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2a00:1450:4864:20::429; envelope-from=joaotavora@gmail.com; helo=mail-wr1-x429.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:269843 Archived-At: Daniel Mendler writes: > On 5/25/21 12:54 AM, Jo=C3=A3o T=C3=A1vora wrote: >> I think the second may not be that useful for the use cases we have >> right now, but let's say I'm wrong and it is. In that case, I think >> we're better giving another optional endpoint to the backend to perform >> this setup teardown. For example, a function of a lambda. > > This sounds like a more complicated and impure API then the > `affixation-function` we have right now. I consider operating on lists > like `affixation-function` to be a cleaner solution. But it is of course > not as general. You may want to do setup/teardown only once, like in > minibuffer-setup/exit-hooks. I don't know if you followed my idea, but yes, a hook also works. Anyway, the case for needing to do these one-time annotation setups/teardowns isn't really established anyway. Jo=C3=A3o