From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Visuwesh Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Adding icon sets to Emacs -- and next steps for icons.el Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 18:56:16 +0530 Message-ID: <87bks9ai2v.fsf@gmail.com> References: <310877950.2974437.1661344999220@mail1.libero.it> <83k06x6ajp.fsf@gnu.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="29758"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/29.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: Dmitry Gutov , angelo.g0@libero.it, emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Eli Zaretskii Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Aug 24 16:19:48 2022 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1oQrER-0007aw-Qw for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 16:19:47 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41784 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQrEQ-0006q0-4c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:19:46 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:56670) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQqOq-0001aM-KO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 09:26:28 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-pj1-x1044.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4864:20::1044]:34783) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_128_GCM_SHA256:128) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1oQqOp-000264-70; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 09:26:28 -0400 Original-Received: by mail-pj1-x1044.google.com with SMTP id c16-20020a17090aa61000b001fb3286d9f7so3400547pjq.1; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 06:26:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:from:to:cc; bh=Sn43Y/10JjIiOIc980gGw/wMr/VqlVf4TjY7kmKlF9s=; b=aeScuxMbhBsZmfGVrpBsT70PJD04hdTqJnxxtu30B306tUZC+2abg9mC6nRBBifTIW I3AqNYDqnwbne6/rK5RODNK0DzjCDLAHuIiGXMfay2z96CFrfKB4G8buKzw7mdswktnl arWVjgAIuQhCV91cPi5PKlzTVP/ncXh1IeOJUV2m9OSV1/IC/OwfU6iZN8P1q59tgiUs w5VDDtZSKFIqytcjBztBmznariF65/Qh/LPu+Kum2tw+qgha6Rdpgb+A8RNyuawkU5d9 f70Th73MuQCOZOi6FdqVNJD+cS8pICbqjLYQTa07bxnbMJbrP/BxUFR4wSstmD9KkzyS 9/lg== X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20210112; h=content-transfer-encoding:mime-version:user-agent:message-id:date :references:in-reply-to:subject:cc:to:from:x-gm-message-state:from :to:cc; bh=Sn43Y/10JjIiOIc980gGw/wMr/VqlVf4TjY7kmKlF9s=; b=fnGAkv+lRbUqgrzm9xR+BlynW9GbutFVt/hkisAR2Z1pHAAfEwtVviEhV80Y2C6JzD A5VyV3+SW6yEHJnvOvxIf7hcksH5ZQ6+SD8YF9QejywKkWXnds0K0ajxxnjMIWsOqReY ttr0rAK1qpJ2xy6VY3VsFrvWZ20KDJpsHeNlnyF3b3vQL9DmE7nDKLydXPQFuK2+hzSD CDHdr3V2jQ9IuTV3R5OTogP0e4XcpevkWaPgFKISW8cMIDHpOwvLHdPREaOlRe/LaF8z uCC4J1+SiM4mq+ZC/3+2nSRkNYqQw40p6S6/Rrd2ssgz2vy37hcZ7qHUmGR5s6VKmQK5 RoYg== X-Gm-Message-State: ACgBeo2zgvOp8/3I18Moz5ypH0YEm/7j+Qxwmqyw7SpTxVwi850mvlDK XSpRsFXDbfUaEVq3Oo2kJxayGu3TSeU= X-Google-Smtp-Source: AA6agR7eEYdhc+TpjcCVvP5Z99punuqp3X+ooKvRB1hyIbXBCLPzJCA/7YqtpmLbkGajmDDPnKY0zA== X-Received: by 2002:a17:90a:7f89:b0:1fa:ad33:7289 with SMTP id m9-20020a17090a7f8900b001faad337289mr8151616pjl.173.1661347585066; Wed, 24 Aug 2022 06:26:25 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from localhost ([118.185.152.162]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id 127-20020a621985000000b00536513060f1sm9047702pfz.187.2022.08.24.06.26.23 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 bits=256/256); Wed, 24 Aug 2022 06:26:24 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <83k06x6ajp.fsf@gnu.org> (Eli Zaretskii's message of "Wed, 24 Aug 2022 16:22:34 +0300") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2607:f8b0:4864:20::1044; envelope-from=visuweshm@gmail.com; helo=mail-pj1-x1044.google.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 10:18:47 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:294030 Archived-At: [=E0=AE=AA=E0=AF=81=E0=AE=A4=E0=AE=A9=E0=AF=8D =E0=AE=86=E0=AE=95=E0=AE=B8= =E0=AF=8D=E0=AE=9F=E0=AF=8D 24, 2022] Eli Zaretskii wrote: > >> Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2022 16:05:14 +0300 >> From: Dmitry Gutov >>=20 >> On 24.08.2022 15:43, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >> > For completeness I attached the old, emacs-old-icons.png, current >> > in master, result. >> >=20 >> > In my opinion, the old is better... >>=20 >> Thanks. >>=20 >> I think the new one is better. > > But "the new one" looks black-and-white here? I doubt losing colors > is going to be loved. I think the current trend is in the opposite direction? Everywhere I go, it is monochrome icons, or the same colour scheme for all the icons making them indistinguishable (looking at you Google).