From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail
From: Michael Heerdegen <michael_heerdegen@web.de>
Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel
Subject: Re: Should `indirect-function' be preferred over `fboundp'?
Date: Sun, 23 Jul 2023 04:37:32 +0200
Message-ID: <87bkg3l5eb.fsf@web.de>
References: <87h6pzxdof.fsf@localhost> <87cz0mul4j.fsf@web.de>
 <87lef994qt.fsf@localhost> <87lef8wthm.fsf@web.de>
 <878rb88bi7.fsf@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain
Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214";
	logging-data="33280"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io"
User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13)
To: emacs-devel@gnu.org
Cancel-Lock: sha1:mNCMsgFApJQX5Afg3eFwDygrVEQ=
Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Jul 23 04:38:42 2023
Return-path: <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>
Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org
Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17])
	by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
	(Exim 4.92)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org>)
	id 1qNOza-0008Se-5F
	for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 04:38:42 +0200
Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1)
	(envelope-from <emacs-devel-bounces@gnu.org>)
	id 1qNOyf-0007CW-Ej; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 22:37:45 -0400
Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10])
 by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1qNOyc-0007CF-46
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 22:37:42 -0400
Original-Received: from ciao.gmane.io ([116.202.254.214])
 by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256)
 (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org>)
 id 1qNOya-0007DS-Oq
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Jul 2023 22:37:41 -0400
Original-Received: from list by ciao.gmane.io with local (Exim 4.92)
 (envelope-from <ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org>) id 1qNOyZ-0007Dh-17
 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 23 Jul 2023 04:37:39 +0200
X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/
Received-SPF: pass client-ip=116.202.254.214;
 envelope-from=ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; helo=ciao.gmane.io
X-Spam_score_int: -13
X-Spam_score: -1.4
X-Spam_bar: -
X-Spam_report: (-1.4 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9,
 FREEMAIL_FORGED_FROMDOMAIN=0.249, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001,
 HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS=0.249, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
 T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
X-Spam_action: no action
X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." <emacs-devel.gnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/options/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:emacs-devel@gnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-devel>,
 <mailto:emacs-devel-request@gnu.org?subject=subscribe>
Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org
Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:308025
Archived-At: <http://permalink.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel/308025>

Ihor Radchenko <yantar92@posteo.net> writes:

> Would it be of interest to add 2 new error types:
> 1. Qvoid_indirect_function
> 2. Qinvalid_indirect_function
>
> It will make it more explicit that it is function indirection that has
> problems.

I think I can live without these, to be honest.  But let's hear other
opinions.

Michael.