From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sam James Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: master 8c81818673a 6/7: Tune volatile in read_char Date: Sun, 18 Aug 2024 22:57:08 +0100 Organization: Gentoo Message-ID: <87bk1p8pfv.fsf@gentoo.org> References: <172386820621.30556.15409337288904485218@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <20240817041648.A6687C2BC66@vcs2.savannah.gnu.org> <87f24fac-aa71-499f-a398-2bad70a0ca42@cs.ucla.edu> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="22121"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" Cc: Andrea Corallo , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Paul Eggert Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Sun Aug 18 23:58:24 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1sfnuq-0005Zv-Io for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 23:58:24 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sfntv-0007Ez-GN; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:57:28 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sfntu-0007Ef-77 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:57:26 -0400 Original-Received: from woodpecker.gentoo.org ([2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4] helo=smtp.gentoo.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_CHACHA20_POLY1305:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1sfnts-0002WS-IQ; Sun, 18 Aug 2024 17:57:25 -0400 In-Reply-To: <87f24fac-aa71-499f-a398-2bad70a0ca42@cs.ucla.edu> (Paul Eggert's message of "Sun, 18 Aug 2024 14:39:50 -0700") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=2001:470:ea4a:1:5054:ff:fec7:86e4; envelope-from=sam@gentoo.org; helo=smtp.gentoo.org X-Spam_score_int: -41 X-Spam_score: -4.2 X-Spam_bar: ---- X-Spam_report: (-4.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:322905 Archived-At: Paul Eggert writes: > On 2024-08-18 00:39, Andrea Corallo wrote: >> Has this optimization any measurable effect? > > On my platform (Ubuntu 24.04 LTS, x86-64, gcc -O2) it shrinks the size > of read_char's machine code by 5%. Could you include that information in the commit message in future?