From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.io!.POSTED.blaine.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sean Whitton Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Is this a bug in while-let or do I missunderstand it? Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 13:32:48 +0800 Message-ID: <87bjya1ncv.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> References: <86ldxrliau.fsf@gnu.org> <865xot2y1d.fsf@fastmail.fm> <86ldxoiqzr.fsf@gnu.org> <86ttccvwwj.fsf@fastmail.fm> <87bjyjfowt.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <874j4bfoen.fsf@melete.silentflame.com> <86cyiz2yaz.fsf@fastmail.fm> <86a5e2l066.fsf@gnu.org> <86o72i5ip1.fsf@fastmail.fm> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain Injection-Info: ciao.gmane.io; posting-host="blaine.gmane.org:116.202.254.214"; logging-data="28728"; mail-complaints-to="usenet@ciao.gmane.io" User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Cc: Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Joost Kremers Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 20 06:33:56 2024 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([209.51.188.17]) by ciao.gmane.io with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.92) (envelope-from ) id 1tDdLg-0007M2-6m for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane-mx.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 06:33:56 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1] helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDdKp-00047e-5T; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:33:03 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDdKm-00047R-SZ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:33:01 -0500 Original-Received: from sendmail.purelymail.com ([34.202.193.197]) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1tDdKl-0003zG-5b for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 00:33:00 -0500 DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=OoAQH+HlmB+UEUA4tx54CZfqH0S6pm7B5hkILZxUmvwQ68Q5ykyvzvTvKHTWmKcOgWL+bfkctvj0pZ4+/iOMp/UPq8e003k/bWCICo7O+o7H0kSW16eoRa510STgpZ10WUODFfwb9dP2+KvneTu5FT0B8Yz/DC9k9vgwCrEkyJN1SuRNbeQoKbTQLUgLTQDDZGvpcg54lhDw2OMT5ea8pBHgT0kFqQrBKaDlaMVI7XJvQtnAaqBr68ccKNhXbnR+0Fbzx7i2EKdtlE5JrEIMrljTskwv3SZvXu74fUkCMp4rQyZ7nV2GGrnhLf5Ld5QVrvnWJ1ochDNH+7nFODjAIg==; s=purelymail3; d=spwhitton.name; v=1; bh=jhpl09tA277COkrqSc58ZFJCIaGVZA6BFvBa261JMU0=; h=Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; b=WnowYDpqKhXxinTMhCkS7MeegShUjSbyARcyf7+qj5z29nEPLaMwGtTsHWhohjcqjYEYKJ60zAq33ZWTNYjZ2hs3lnLnaooXWBEyCuzNdYuo1ZDhNMUH9Yr9PvkB3sU0dKuWlBc3cbp3QvV77HJ+hqtuxo97n3hj3k9a4DO5qaoLzrvJWeVTvTkp3Zr+vedXOUppqAji+FIW5wdWHzD71Lg4UfkUJV0agVfp/d8pE9YK7HpdxVixgRLd2hCNaE50/I7X9S/6/CHVmZpkPZGJWs4Imd8MOpLzaVAbxZtgU1uw4zD8y2wftKpIWoOCRhuawXsf5uP0DYzwdfzbwLktpA==; s=purelymail3; d=purelymail.com; v=1; bh=jhpl09tA277COkrqSc58ZFJCIaGVZA6BFvBa261JMU0=; h=Feedback-ID:Received:Received:From:To:Subject:Date; Feedback-ID: 20115:3760:null:purelymail X-Pm-Original-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Received: by smtp.purelymail.com (Purelymail SMTP) with ESMTPSA id -1012448923; (version=TLSv1.3 cipher=TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384); Wed, 20 Nov 2024 05:32:52 +0000 (UTC) Original-Received: by melete.silentflame.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id E274E7E6874; Wed, 20 Nov 2024 13:32:48 +0800 (CST) In-Reply-To: <86o72i5ip1.fsf@fastmail.fm> (Joost Kremers's message of "Thu, 14 Nov 2024 09:21:46 +0100") Received-SPF: pass client-ip=34.202.193.197; envelope-from=spwhitton@spwhitton.name; helo=sendmail.purelymail.com X-Spam_score_int: -20 X-Spam_score: -2.1 X-Spam_bar: -- X-Spam_report: (-2.1 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_CERTIFIED_BLOCKED=0.001, RCVD_IN_VALIDITY_RPBL_BLOCKED=0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane-mx.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.io gmane.emacs.devel:325517 Archived-At: Hello Joost, Have you been able to prepare an updated patch? Thanks. On Thu 14 Nov 2024 at 09:21am +01, Joost Kremers wrote: >> The disadvantage of what you did is that you need to say repeatedly >> >> @var{varlist} has the same form as in @code{if-let*}. >> >> and the reader has to go back, read the description of if-let* (which >> she might not want to know anything about), and decide which parts of >> that description are relevant to whatever macro she is interested in. > > Okay, so I'll put the explanation of VARLIST into the description of every > macro. > >>> +Each element of @code{varlist} has the form @code{(@var{symbol} >>> +@var{value-form})}: >> >> This form is better put in @w{..}, to prevent it being split between >> lines. > > Ok. -- Sean Whitton