From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Stefan Monnier Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Filling woes Date: Wed, 18 May 2005 21:31:47 -0400 Message-ID: <87acms80lf.fsf-monnier+emacs@gnu.org> References: NNTP-Posting-Host: main.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1116466417 15387 80.91.229.2 (19 May 2005 01:33:37 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 19 May 2005 01:33:37 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu May 19 03:33:29 2005 Return-path: Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by ciao.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYZuZ-0003WM-OQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 19 May 2005 03:33:20 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYZx7-0002LO-FZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 21:35:57 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DYZwl-0002HJ-7f for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 21:35:35 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1DYZwh-0002EK-HK for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 21:35:31 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1DYZwg-00028R-TE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 21:35:30 -0400 Original-Received: from [209.226.175.34] (helo=tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1DYa1D-0007rw-UN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 18 May 2005 21:40:12 -0400 Original-Received: from alfajor ([70.49.81.51]) by tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net (InterMail vM.5.01.06.10 201-253-122-130-110-20040306) with ESMTP id <20050519013148.QOLK25800.tomts13-srv.bellnexxia.net@alfajor>; Wed, 18 May 2005 21:31:48 -0400 Original-Received: by alfajor (Postfix, from userid 1000) id CA658D7322; Wed, 18 May 2005 21:31:47 -0400 (EDT) Original-To: Alan Mackenzie In-Reply-To: (Alan Mackenzie's message of "Tue, 17 May 2005 20:20:11 +0000 (GMT)") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:37324 X-Report-Spam: http://spam.gmane.org/gmane.emacs.devel:37324 > This is crazy! The default value for `adaptive-fiill-regexp' matches the > null string, so if I want to use `adaptive-fill-function', I've got to > somehow clobber this regexp. Having done that, I would have to > incorporate its functionality into my `adaptive-fill-function'. YUCK!!! > Surely `adaptive-fill-function' should be tried first. MUST be tried > first. Surely? Or have I missed something significant in the filling > mechanism? I'd tend to agree. I remember going through similar steps at some point, and also wondering who came up with the idea of only checking adaptive-fill-function as a last resort. What was he thinking? Stefan