From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Thien-Thi Nguyen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: when emacs 22.1 release will ready? Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:29:59 +0200 Message-ID: <87abwq2j7s.fsf@ambire.localdomain> References: <259495020704291337s35dd584fi3b7ef1dd511b11d4@mail.gmail.com> <4635C39F.9050502@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1177932603 23246 80.91.229.12 (30 Apr 2007 11:30:03 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:30:03 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Leo Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Apr 30 13:30:02 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1HiU4u-0001Lr-Te for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:30:01 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HiUB5-00055Q-HM for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:36:23 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HiUB0-00051r-Au for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1HiUAy-0004yY-JQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:36:18 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1HiUAy-0004y2-Cj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:36:16 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp-out3.libero.it ([212.52.84.43]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1HiU4m-0002kS-Jq for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 07:29:52 -0400 Original-Received: from localhost (172.31.0.54) by smtp-out3.libero.it (7.3.120) id 4611FE5E019E6BAF; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:29:50 +0200 X-Scanned: with antispam and antivirus automated system at libero.it Original-Received: from smtp-out2.libero.it ([172.31.0.38]) by localhost (asav-out12.libero.it [192.168.32.40]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c3VJQ05HVPYa; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:29:50 +0200 (CEST) Original-Received: from ambire.localdomain (151.21.37.221) by smtp-out2.libero.it (7.3.120) id 4611FD38026A9DA8; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:29:50 +0200 Original-Received: from ttn by ambire.localdomain with local (Exim 4.50) id 1HiU4t-0001GU-DG; Mon, 30 Apr 2007 13:29:59 +0200 In-Reply-To: (Leo's message of "Mon\, 30 Apr 2007 11\:37\:39 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.11 (Gnus v5.11) Emacs/22.1.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:70408 Archived-At: () Leo () Mon, 30 Apr 2007 11:37:39 +0100 I feel it is unfair the developers valid point of view is deliberately ignored by rms. ignorance at any level is unfair, but ignorance cannot be completely avoided; no one knows everything. if one were to know everyhing, one would (perhaps sadly) know this all the more. thi