From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Miles Bader Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: ChangeLog entry timestamp Date: Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:51:43 +0900 Message-ID: <87abt8obu8.fsf@catnip.gol.com> References: <46B33A19.60405@ig.com.br> <86ejikit99.fsf@lola.quinscape.zz> Reply-To: Miles Bader NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: sea.gmane.org 1186156465 9634 80.91.229.12 (3 Aug 2007 15:54:25 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@sea.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 3 Aug 2007 15:54:25 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Vinicius Jose Latorre , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 03 17:54:22 2007 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1IGzTm-0000Zn-Eh for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 17:54:21 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1] helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGzTk-00019v-QC for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:54:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IGzTF-0000yd-FR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:53:45 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1IGzT8-0000va-LW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:53:45 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1IGzT8-0000vW-8N for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:53:38 -0400 Original-Received: from smtp02.dentaku.gol.com ([203.216.5.72]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1IGzSS-00016q-FT; Fri, 03 Aug 2007 11:52:57 -0400 Original-Received: from 203-216-96-074.dsl.gol.ne.jp ([203.216.96.74] helo=catnip.gol.com) by smtp02.dentaku.gol.com with esmtpa (Dentaku) id 1IGzRI-0006DN-Pn; Sat, 04 Aug 2007 00:51:44 +0900 Original-Received: by catnip.gol.com (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 087AF300E; Sat, 4 Aug 2007 00:51:43 +0900 (JST) System-Type: i686-pc-linux-gnu In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Fri\, 03 Aug 2007 10\:52\:18 -0400") Original-Lines: 14 X-Abuse-Complaints: abuse@gol.com X-Detected-Kernel: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:75999 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > Actually, the date should be the date it was committed, so it should > be sorted. Not sure about what should happen in case of merges, tho. I think because of merges, things are always basically going to be a bit screwed up. There's no perfect solution. I'd suggest the best thing would be to relax and not worry about slightly misordered timestamps on entries. It's not a big deal. -Miles -- The key to happiness is having dreams. [from a fortune cookie]