From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Release plans Date: Sat, 02 Aug 2008 13:08:56 +0900 Message-ID: <87abfwm52f.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87r69wcxn7.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <871w18cza2.fsf@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1217649262 31947 80.91.229.12 (2 Aug 2008 03:54:22 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 2 Aug 2008 03:54:22 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 02 05:55:12 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KP8D1-0002x3-Rx for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 02 Aug 2008 05:55:12 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46619 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KP8C7-0003zB-5l for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:54:15 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KP8C0-0003yT-WA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:54:09 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KP8By-0003y2-UE for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:54:07 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=44891 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KP8By-0003xz-Qc for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:55282) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KP8By-00074a-AN for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Aug 2008 23:54:06 -0400 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4385A1535B8; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 12:53:55 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7A7541A25C3; Sat, 2 Aug 2008 13:08:56 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: <871w18cza2.fsf@gmail.com> X-Mailer: VM ?bug? under XEmacs 21.5.21 (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:101935 Archived-At: Jay Belanger writes: > A while back, I came across a note saying that any package that is > developed within Emacs shouldn't have it's own version numbering. I've > looked in vain for that note, but have been unable to find it. However, > Calc is now a fully owned subsidiary of Emacs, Inc., so is there any > reason why Calc should have its own version number? XEmacs packages it separately, and will continue to do so for the foreseeable future. Until y'all move to a tree-oriented VCS version numbers (and tags in the Calc portion of the tree) would be helpful in comparing what we got to upstream.