From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Sven Joachim Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: How to reply to bug reports Date: Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:25:26 +0200 Message-ID: <87abfnhc55.fsf@gmx.de> References: <489C3395.2000103@gmx.at> <87iqubhe7w.fsf@gmx.de> <489C461B.8030404@gmx.at> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218202169 3034 80.91.229.12 (8 Aug 2008 13:29:29 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 8 Aug 2008 13:29:29 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel To: martin rudalics Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Aug 08 15:30:20 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KRS2n-00025N-Ne for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:30:14 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:37704 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KRS1s-0007aG-7c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:29:16 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRS1m-0007WF-PD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:29:10 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KRS1k-0007Rf-Gd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:29:09 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=33411 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KRS1k-0007RH-CG for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: from mail.gmx.net ([213.165.64.20]:52437) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KRS1j-0007y2-RA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:29:08 -0400 Original-Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 08 Aug 2008 13:29:05 -0000 Original-Received: from p54864090.dip.t-dialin.net (EHLO debian) [84.134.64.144] by mail.gmx.net (mp055) with SMTP; 08 Aug 2008 15:29:05 +0200 X-Authenticated: #28250155 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX18Rwn16NM0Rduljp6l9oXKuoopl1geul5ut25tBLF l+PKD1pf3kKuNI In-Reply-To: <489C461B.8030404@gmx.at> (martin rudalics's message of "Fri, 08 Aug 2008 15:11:55 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.71 X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102203 Archived-At: On 2008-08-08 15:11 +0200, martin rudalics wrote: >>>If I do not cc bug-gnu-emacs, my reply won't appear there and chances to >>>get feedback from other developers are low as I noticed a couple of >>>times. If I do cc bug-gnu-emacs I apparently file a new bug report as >>>already happened twice this week. >> >> You should CC the bug number, i.e. NNN@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com, but >> not bug-gnu-emacs. This will avoid opening new bug reports as well as >> duplicate messages on bug-gnu-emacs. > > That's what I did initially. For older bug reports there's hardly a > chance that the OP replies or applies a patch :-( You have to CC the submitter if you want him to answer, did you do that? Note that mails sent to NNN@emacsbugs.donarmstrong.com will appear on bug-gnu-emacs, albeit not immediately. Sven