From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 22.2.90 pretest Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:53:53 -0400 Message-ID: <87abfc52am.fsf@cyd.mit.edu> References: <87y72ymcig.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87od3tkrd4.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <20080816152351.GA7654@agmartin.aq.upm.es> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1218905607 14125 80.91.229.12 (16 Aug 2008 16:53:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2008 16:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Agustin Martin Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Aug 16 18:54:19 2008 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1KUP2d-0001Gn-Hj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 18:54:15 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57016 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KUP1h-0003wo-3L for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:53:17 -0400 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KUP1V-0003lh-GA for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1KUP1T-0003k8-QB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:53:05 -0400 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=40146 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1KUP1T-0003jq-I4 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: from cyd.mit.edu ([18.115.2.24]:43943) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1KUP1T-0000i3-6A for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:53:03 -0400 Original-Received: by cyd.mit.edu (Postfix, from userid 1000) id EBD5C57E1C7; Sat, 16 Aug 2008 12:53:53 -0400 (EDT) In-Reply-To: <20080816152351.GA7654@agmartin.aq.upm.es> (Agustin Martin's message of "Sat, 16 Aug 2008 17:23:51 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.0.60 (gnu/linux) X-detected-kernel: by monty-python.gnu.org: Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:102536 Archived-At: Agustin Martin writes: > I think only the change in (flyspell-word) is causing the > problem. There was no call there before new function > (ispell-set-spellchecker-params) call was added to HEAD. This makes > sure expensive (ispell-check-version) call is done only when there is > an spellchecker change (or is the first time is used). However > (ispell-maybe-find-aspell-dictionaries) does not do that check, so is > very expensive when put there, since (flyspell-word) is continuosly > called. Indeed; I've reverted the change in flyspell-word. Thanks.