From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: "Stephen J. Turnbull" Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Workflow to accumulate individual changes? Date: Fri, 01 Jan 2010 21:35:26 +0900 Message-ID: <87aawyngtt.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> References: <87fx6sm8yl.fsf@telefonica.net> <873a2slzrr.fsf@telefonica.net> <83ws03db8v.fsf@gnu.org> <87skarapxo.fsf@red-bean.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262348748 16461 80.91.229.12 (1 Jan 2010 12:25:48 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 1 Jan 2010 12:25:48 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Karl Fogel , ofv@wanadoo.es, eliz@gnu.org, emacs-devel@gnu.org, lekktu@gmail.com To: rms@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Jan 01 13:25:40 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NQgZR-0007dp-5c for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 13:25:33 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:46749 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQgZR-0006qT-Kt for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:25:33 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQgZL-0006pc-FV for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:25:27 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NQgZG-0006m3-Ci for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:25:26 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=48903 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NQgZG-0006lp-55 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:25:22 -0500 Original-Received: from mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp ([130.158.97.223]:50750) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NQgZB-0007kN-IQ; Fri, 01 Jan 2010 07:25:17 -0500 Original-Received: from uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp [130.158.99.156]) by mtps01.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix) with ESMTP id A1A681535A8; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 21:25:16 +0900 (JST) Original-Received: by uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp (Postfix, from userid 1000) id A5BF31A33D7; Fri, 1 Jan 2010 21:35:26 +0900 (JST) In-Reply-To: X-Mailer: VM 8.0.12-devo-585 under 21.5 (beta29) "garbanzo" 1444e28f1a3d XEmacs Lucid (x86_64-unknown-linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119201 Archived-At: Richard Stallman writes: > I've never used 'bzr rebase', and have no competency to evaluate the > arguments either way here, but... wouldn't something would smell fishy > if rebase were part of our regular workflow? That somehow seems wrong. > > Are you saying that hackers who rebase can get addicted? ;-). There's plenty of examples!