From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Karl Fogel Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Surely 'bzr update' shouldn't be this slow? Date: Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:17:20 -0500 Message-ID: <87aawqt05b.fsf@red-bean.com> References: <20100103174743.GB1653@muc.de> <87bphbhxxt.fsf@telefonica.net> <20100106131039.GB2447@muc.de> <4B448FF5.5060900@gnu.org> <87hbqze39u.fsf@telefonica.net> <20100107134011.GA2381@muc.de> <87wrzuc93h.fsf@telefonica.net> <20100107145216.GB2381@muc.de> Reply-To: Karl Fogel NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1262877494 27248 80.91.229.12 (7 Jan 2010 15:18:14 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Thu, 7 Jan 2010 15:18:14 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , Alan Mackenzie , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Thu Jan 07 16:18:05 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.50) id 1NSu7c-0002jS-9Q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 16:18:00 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:45374 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSu7c-0007gm-Nc for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:18:00 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSu77-0007UK-SB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:17:29 -0500 Original-Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NSu73-0007SP-8x for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:17:29 -0500 Original-Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=59103 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NSu73-0007SK-6a for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:17:25 -0500 Original-Received: from sanpietro.red-bean.com ([66.146.206.141]:33033) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS-1.0:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NSu72-0003HU-I2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 10:17:24 -0500 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:48623 helo=kfogel-work ident=kfogel) by sanpietro.red-bean.com with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1NSu70-00068J-N8; Thu, 07 Jan 2010 09:17:23 -0600 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Thu, 7 Jan 2010 16:00:35 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.91 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by monty-python.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:119584 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: >> Their basic assumptions don't match the Emacs project, for whatever >> reason. > >Their basic assumption, which seems quite reasonable, is that people >will use the smart server, not sftp, for such a big project. Yes. I *think* we are having a savannah problem here, not a bzr problem. People may find it faster to use the Launchpad.net mirror of Emacs until Savannah gets bzr+ssh:// access (smart server). -Karl