From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs 23.1.93 pretest Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:53:11 -0500 Message-ID: <87aauqjyag.fsf@stupidchicken.com> References: <87pr3rny7e.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87y6ia67ai.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <5FD28DD4744D4340B9DCCE0C6A8580F2@us.oracle.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1267559607 23501 80.91.229.12 (2 Mar 2010 19:53:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 2 Mar 2010 19:53:27 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: "Drew Adams" Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Mar 02 20:53:23 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmY9f-0002V8-Tr for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 20:53:20 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:57729 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmY9f-0003km-6j for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:53:19 -0500 Original-Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NmY9b-0003kh-F7 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:53:15 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=42010 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NmY9a-0003kZ-Ot for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:53:15 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmY9a-0008AZ-0I for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:53:14 -0500 Original-Received: from pantheon-po25.its.yale.edu ([130.132.50.119]:45351) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1NmY9Z-0008AE-Ud for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 14:53:13 -0500 Original-Received: from furry (dhcp128036014112.central.yale.edu [128.36.14.112]) (authenticated bits=0) by pantheon-po25.its.yale.edu (8.12.11.20060308/8.12.11) with ESMTP id o22JrB57029647 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:53:11 -0500 Original-Received: by furry (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D135FC05D; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 14:53:11 -0500 (EST) In-Reply-To: <5FD28DD4744D4340B9DCCE0C6A8580F2@us.oracle.com> (Drew Adams's message of "Tue, 2 Mar 2010 10:35:28 -0800") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.1.93 (gnu/linux) X-YaleITSMailFilter: Version 1.2c (attachment(s) not renamed) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.4-2.6 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:121571 Archived-At: "Drew Adams" writes: > Fair enough. Is there a point in publishing a new release without testing on > Windows, in particular, testing the fixes for those serious bugs? > > Or did you plan to publish another pretest with the bugs fixed? That would be > good (normal). That wasn't clear from your mails. There should be at least two more pretests before the 23.2 release.