From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Bastien Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: elpa.gnu.org (Stale archive-contents?) Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:17:44 +0100 Message-ID: <87aalhayiv.fsf@altern.org> References: <81vd48xive.fsf@gmail.com> <87tyjryhui.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <81fwvar0a4.fsf@gmail.com> <874obqza7f.fsf@stupidchicken.com> <87bp5y6yhi.fsf@gnu.org> <87oc9yq63h.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrolm88t.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1289412451 17596 80.91.229.12 (10 Nov 2010 18:07:31 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:07:31 +0000 (UTC) Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Ted Zlatanov Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Nov 10 19:07:26 2010 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([199.232.76.165]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1PGF4s-0000Ud-BZ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 19:07:25 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1]:33990 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PGF4p-0003Pl-7q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:07:19 -0500 Original-Received: from [140.186.70.92] (port=36483 helo=eggs.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1PGEJ1-0002Tr-Ej for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:17:56 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PGEJ0-00061H-AC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:17:55 -0500 Original-Received: from mail-fx0-f41.google.com ([209.85.161.41]:38815) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1PGEJ0-00060v-2h for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 12:17:54 -0500 Original-Received: by fxm20 with SMTP id 20so570215fxm.0 for ; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:17:53 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:sender:received:from:to:cc :subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date:message-id :mime-version:content-type; bh=kzbb4oJ/jdxuJwbhJqliM8Rkpqm4fsri6Q7ExMuC/yc=; b=KTllBi64vSasMjQLshw/AMnOU9d9ADEi9Vc+HD+bE+M4IH5Qm2DF3Ti/yeNO/hvZkx 7eRZbwbYUN8fa8DhMr/VPIJ0nkXa0QDj/2DIOLs5puP86aQKNL8HoK/TmTPzBNZcjUnv OZiY4LnS+EMJ2GILwxGWqN9Ht0lOnZc6b2C4k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=googlemail.com; s=gamma; h=sender:from:to:cc:subject:in-reply-to:references:user-agent:date :message-id:mime-version:content-type; b=MSaZtslY0gkvVCTdqXr57FyMCZ5EFHmtiQ1DJa7aiT3X3Nk3OI9aegrZ+1z+YI62Ec yAtWD86I1d6l2p99gCHqKFz7Zmxw4AO0Cp00y0t7vX9rMimDqg70FGMmYexMtiF2nAiA p2NC/GM4YT3EOLIy5e/BL54656GCQdZuMv4bI= Original-Received: by 10.216.30.10 with SMTP id j10mr1347212wea.8.1289409472602; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:17:52 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: from myhost.localdomain (fon75-1-78-192-119-5.fbxo.proxad.net [78.192.119.5]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id y15sm599737weq.30.2010.11.10.09.17.51 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 10 Nov 2010 09:17:51 -0800 (PST) Original-Received: by myhost.localdomain (Postfix, from userid 1000) id D78A4400D3; Wed, 10 Nov 2010 18:17:44 +0100 (CET) In-Reply-To: <87wrolm88t.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 10 Nov 2010 10:52:18 -0600") User-Agent: Gnus/5.110011 (No Gnus v0.11) Emacs/23.2 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 2) X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 10 Nov 2010 13:03:13 -0500 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:132520 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > I fixed a bug in the repo builder script. It should have the latest > org-mode now. I confirm this, thanks a lot! But now I have two entries, one for 20101101 and one for 20101110. I guess this is a problem in package.el. This might confuse users, especially those who count in binary, since the old Org comes then *after* the newest one ;) -- Bastien