From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Daiki Ueno Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: secure plist store Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:39:59 +0900 Message-ID: <87aad0kb80.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> References: <87sjrttwh8.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrh4b9h9.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aae05l8p.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> <87k4d4b66p.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrh0fh4g.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87y60ncma8.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <87vcvrne02.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> <87r56ep3sm.fsf@lifelogs.com> <874o39n171.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> <87r56csynd.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87wrg4kh7p.fsf-ueno@unixuser.org> <87sjqsrew2.fsf@lifelogs.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1309359526 30820 80.91.229.12 (29 Jun 2011 14:58:46 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 29 Jun 2011 14:58:46 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Jun 29 16:58:42 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1QbwDy-0004ku-Aq for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 16:58:42 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:43283 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1QbwDw-00032h-CD for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 10:58:40 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:49563) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbuzy-0006dt-C9 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:40:15 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbuzv-0002Z1-HB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:40:09 -0400 Original-Received: from ivory4.scn-net.ne.jp ([219.117.176.192]:47295) by eggs.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbuzu-0002W6-H1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 09:40:07 -0400 Original-Received: from ([192.168.0.187]) (envelope sender: ) by ivory4.scn-net.ne.jp with Active!Hunter esmtp server; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:40:00 +0900 Original-Received: Received: from well-done.deisui.org (g187018.scn-net.ne.jp [202.83.187.18]) (authenticated) by blue17.scn-net.ne.jp (unknown) with ESMTP id p5TDe0dA005249 for ; Wed, 29 Jun 2011 22:40:00 +0900 In-Reply-To: <87sjqsrew2.fsf@lifelogs.com> (Ted Zlatanov's message of "Wed, 29 Jun 2011 07:38:53 -0500") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/23.3 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6, seldom 2.4 (older, 4) X-Received-From: 219.117.176.192 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:141175 Archived-At: Ted Zlatanov writes: > DU> OK, honestly, I would say that it won't work with GPG2 since GPG2 does > DU> always do the password operation in the agent. Have you tried that? > > I'm not sure what you're asking, unfortunately. What do you want me to try? I mean, simply, have you tested your code with GPG2? Regards, -- Daiki Ueno