From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nix Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Emacs bzr memory footprint Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:34:42 +0100 Message-ID: <87aa8o3j4t.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> References: <83fwix2osa.fsf@gnu.org> <0B3EE7A4-D0D6-4D1E-ADC4-0BEE68F179B2@mit.edu> <87fwivwp37.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87sjmvpmd2.fsf@lifelogs.com> <87aa93wmc4.fsf@turtle.gmx.de> <87sjmnrdjw.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87ty73mc0m.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87mxcp2cv0.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> NNTP-Posting-Host: lo.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1319574896 32135 80.91.229.12 (25 Oct 2011 20:34:56 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Tue, 25 Oct 2011 20:34:56 +0000 (UTC) Cc: John Wiegley , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Tue Oct 25 22:34:52 2011 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by lo.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RIni0-0004jg-AQ for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 22:34:52 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:57998 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RInhz-0003NS-Uk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:34:51 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:39909) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RInhw-0003NL-SB for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:34:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RInhv-0007wY-Ne for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:34:48 -0400 Original-Received: from icebox.esperi.org.uk ([81.187.191.129]:57420 helo=mail.esperi.org.uk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RInhv-0007wK-FD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:34:47 -0400 Original-Received: from esperi.org.uk (nix@spindle.srvr.nix [192.168.14.15]) by mail.esperi.org.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id p9PKYgxv010594; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:34:42 +0100 Original-Received: (from nix@localhost) by esperi.org.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5/Submit) id p9PKYgkW001231; Tue, 25 Oct 2011 21:34:42 +0100 Emacs: resistance is futile; you will be assimilated and byte-compiled. In-Reply-To: (Stefan Monnier's message of "Tue, 25 Oct 2011 16:23:10 -0400") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.90 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-URT-Metrics: spindle 1060; Body=3 Fuz1=3 Fuz2=3 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 81.187.191.129 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:145530 Archived-At: On 25 Oct 2011, Stefan Monnier stated: >>> If this output does not explain the process's size you're seeing, then >>> we have a leak in the C code somewhere. >> Oh yes. > > Do you use the libgnutls bindings, by any chance? Yes. > If so, can you try to avoid using it and just stick to > gnutls-cli instead? It looks like doing that is a simple matter of compiling it out and open-network-stream will fall back automatically, so, sure, I'll do that next time I rebuild (probably tomorrow), let it run for a few days, and see if it bloats. -- NULL && (void)