From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Chong Yidong Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: bug#10612: GnuTLS bundled with the windows Emacs binaries Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:00:00 +0800 Message-ID: <87aa566m3z.fsf@gnu.org> References: <84boromyob.fsf@tum.de> <84ipknew07.fsf@tum.de> <87ipjzs512.fsf@gnus.org> <87wr8e8o58.fsf_-_@lifelogs.com> <4F256D1E.4070902@gmail.com> <4F257D1F.5050105@gmail.com> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: dough.gmane.org 1327885223 29637 80.91.229.3 (30 Jan 2012 01:00:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@dough.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 30 Jan 2012 01:00:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: Christoph Scholtes , Ted Zlatanov , Eli Zaretskii , Emacs-Devel devel To: Juanma Barranquero Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Jan 30 02:00:22 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([140.186.70.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1RrfbZ-00006x-A1 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 30 Jan 2012 02:00:21 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:58803 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrfbY-0000zw-Ss for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:00:20 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([140.186.70.92]:51506) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrfbV-0000zg-MD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:00:18 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrfbU-0002HX-D1 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:00:17 -0500 Original-Received: from fencepost.gnu.org ([140.186.70.10]:52322) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrfbU-0002HT-AD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:00:16 -0500 Original-Received: from bb121-7-229-69.singnet.com.sg ([121.7.229.69]:49988 helo=furball) by fencepost.gnu.org with esmtpsa (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1RrfbS-0003Kb-TR; Sun, 29 Jan 2012 20:00:15 -0500 In-Reply-To: (Juanma Barranquero's message of "Sun, 29 Jan 2012 18:26:57 +0100") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.0.93 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.6 (newer, 3) X-Received-From: 140.186.70.10 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:148028 Archived-At: Juanma Barranquero writes: > The main argument is still that GnuTLS, etc. have their own projects > and maintainers, and they should be the ones taking care of building > and distributing it. Agreed. I think it is sufficient to have a URL to the GnuTLS binaries (and sources!). If the worry is that Windows users won't see that URL, we can put the notice somewhere on our webpage next to the download link, and/or in a "read me first" file on the FTP site.