From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nix Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [PATCH] Added inotify support. Date: Sat, 06 Oct 2012 17:41:16 +0100 Message-ID: <87a9vztuxf.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> References: <2181827.T3JxG88qQt@descartes> <83lifoa7hr.fsf@gnu.org> <87obkkcu92.fsf@wanadoo.es> <87lifkvoxl.fsf@spindle.srvr.nix> <87ipaoqdy3.fsf@uwakimon.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1349541683 20299 80.91.229.3 (6 Oct 2012 16:41:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 6 Oct 2012 16:41:23 +0000 (UTC) Cc: =?utf-8?Q?=C3=93scar?= Fuentes , "Stephen J. Turnbull" , Stefan Monnier , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Andreas Schwab Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 06 18:41:29 2012 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXRP-0005Ji-Us for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 18:41:28 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:48320 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXRJ-0007YB-Uu for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:41:21 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:40409) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXRI-0007Y1-5P for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:41:20 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXRG-0007JP-V3 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:41:20 -0400 Original-Received: from icebox.esperi.org.uk ([81.187.191.129]:34620 helo=mail.esperi.org.uk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1TKXRG-0007J0-LO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 06 Oct 2012 12:41:18 -0400 Original-Received: from spindle.srvr.nix (nix@spindle.srvr.nix [192.168.14.15]) by mail.esperi.org.uk (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id q96GfGEd000148; Sat, 6 Oct 2012 17:41:16 +0100 Emacs: because one operating system isn't enough. In-Reply-To: (Andreas Schwab's message of "Sat, 06 Oct 2012 09:23:39 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/24.2.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-STAT_FI_X86_64_VIRTUAL-Metrics: spindle 1245; Body=5 Fuz1=5 Fuz2=5 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 81.187.191.129 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:154128 Archived-At: On 6 Oct 2012, Andreas Schwab verbalised: > "Stephen J. Turnbull" writes: > >> These days, though (as I am very tired of hearing but seems to be >> true) most people who use Emacs don't mount remote filesystems. > > I think NAS boxes are still common. If anything they are more common than they used to be in the large parts of the world where the cost of power is shooting up, not going down: NASes often use quite a lot less power than a desktop with the same number of disks would, and much less than a headless server with the same number of disks in addition to the desktop. (Though I actually do have a headless server with a disk farm, but I know that is pretty unusual for a home user.) -- NULL && (void)