From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Ted Zlatanov Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: About the web pages repository Date: Wed, 01 May 2013 11:39:05 -0400 Organization: =?utf-8?B?0KLQtdC+0LTQvtGAINCX0LvQsNGC0LDQvdC+0LI=?= @ Cienfuegos Message-ID: <87a9oek8va.fsf@lifelogs.com> References: <87ehe5wlgb.fsf@zigzag.favinet> <87r4hrk0ym.fsf@lifelogs.com> Reply-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1367422767 26148 80.91.229.3 (1 May 2013 15:39:27 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 1 May 2013 15:39:27 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed May 01 17:39:25 2013 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UXZ7t-0000F0-Aj for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 May 2013 17:39:25 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:44371 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXZ7s-0000YG-KU for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 01 May 2013 11:39:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:35486) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXZ7o-0000Xy-CQ for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2013 11:39:22 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXZ7n-0007g1-HR for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2013 11:39:20 -0400 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:47047) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1UXZ7n-0007er-B6 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2013 11:39:19 -0400 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1UXZ7l-00007U-3V for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 01 May 2013 17:39:17 +0200 Original-Received: from pool-71-174-194-90.bstnma.east.verizon.net ([71.174.194.90]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 May 2013 17:39:17 +0200 Original-Received: from tzz by pool-71-174-194-90.bstnma.east.verizon.net with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Wed, 01 May 2013 17:39:17 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Mail-Followup-To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-Lines: 20 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: pool-71-174-194-90.bstnma.east.verizon.net X-Face: bd.DQ~'29fIs`T_%O%C\g%6jW)yi[zuz6; d4V0`@y-~$#3P_Ng{@m+e4o<4P'#(_GJQ%TT= D}[Ep*b!\e,fBZ'j_+#"Ps?s2!4H2-Y"sx" Mail-Copies-To: never User-Agent: Gnus/5.130006 (Ma Gnus v0.6) Emacs/24.3.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:kwesOfhSLE8G1RZgRnhsWwuvXsA= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:159242 Archived-At: On Wed, 1 May 2013 20:41:25 +0800 Xue Fuqiao wrote: XF> On Wed, May 1, 2013 at 8:17 AM, Ted Zlatanov wrote: >> On Sat, 20 Apr 2013 19:11:26 +0800 xfq wrote: >> x> That's true. In emacs-devel, there's huge amounts of opinion throwing. x> People don't agree on things, especially on UI/VCS/freedom. These x> threads often spans into hundreds of messages and debates. In the end, x> typically nothing is done or changed. After years, the very same issue x> pops up again... >> >> Any thread on emacs-devel can be ended immediately by asking for >> documentation. XF> Sorry but I really don't understand what you mean, would you please explain? No one wants to do the boring work of writing docs, but almost everyone wants to contribute code. And absolutely everyone has an opinion. Ted