From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Jay Belanger Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New maintainer Date: Mon, 05 Oct 2015 15:16:15 -0500 Message-ID: <87a8rx5awg.fsf@gmail.com> References: <560CCEBA.9080607@online.de> <874miapdhs.fsf@openmailbox.org> <8737xuuw2y.fsf@rabkins.net> <87lhbmkrle.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87si5r22qh.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <5612CEA6.3010809@yandex.ru> <87egh95cze.fsf@gmail.com> <5612D36B.1030906@yandex.ru> Reply-To: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1444076337 27503 80.91.229.3 (5 Oct 2015 20:18:57 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Mon, 5 Oct 2015 20:18:57 +0000 (UTC) Cc: jay.p.belanger@gmail.com To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Mon Oct 05 22:18:51 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCDh-0006gm-6F for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 22:18:49 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:47498 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCDg-0008Qy-AY for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:18:48 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58258) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCDd-0008PY-4U for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:18:45 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCDZ-0003Ys-VW for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:18:45 -0400 Original-Received: from mail-ig0-x22a.google.com ([2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22a]:37848) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1ZjCDZ-0003Yh-Qf for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 16:18:41 -0400 Original-Received: by igcpe7 with SMTP id pe7so9958933igc.0 for ; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:18:41 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=from:to:subject:references:reply-to:cc:date:in-reply-to:message-id :user-agent:mime-version:content-type; bh=0DKZ5ZuqXGTfrxwwXCAIe6+CL5VWtP5LwrOuT2OkhMI=; b=vQ9gsdmBpNgvb3nsC5b6QViyZqZosgmX/DPhPUlP8jDb4f5g995AYLrchR7OLM1ip5 zrfMZ+EgaIRZSCxg+2Km2mIirGNxc1EvuuVgFi1hyvEXyU5thfQcq9igqT8LAnZLh8dQ iVwzxu72xurAFjw4pRotob8arCq6/a0dXymWU4X5T7V5SQ9fd+GIrlrRFvFxoNXoYOEK MiDWWpOoHjy+pR/QGY2RTu2oUvIonw4akK1PMxZMnbqxDT8f3k63pajND93ey31WJVVr DBUVUp1E6reiXFZQSQsdU1NaWX5Z83bSE+zpa6q8n9gAO5D3/sef/Dtn55b5qjBN8Yf2 deGg== X-Received: by 10.50.66.197 with SMTP id h5mr11036057igt.82.1444076321280; Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:18:41 -0700 (PDT) Original-Received: from vh213601 (vh213601.truman.edu. [150.243.162.59]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id a193sm10883216ioe.37.2015.10.05.13.18.39 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=RC4-SHA bits=128/128); Mon, 05 Oct 2015 13:18:39 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5612D36B.1030906@yandex.ru> (Dmitry Gutov's message of "Mon, 5 Oct 2015 22:45:47 +0300") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Error: Malformed IPv6 address (bad octet value). X-Received-From: 2607:f8b0:4001:c05::22a X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:190968 Archived-At: >> Maybe I'm misreading it, but it doesn't sound like what Richard meant at >> all. I read it as the features have to actually work with GCC ("not just a >> theoretical idea") to be included. > > The issue is that GCC, in its current state, doesn't provide a certain > set a features Emacs can take advantage of, that Clang does. That's the point. It sounded like Richard was saying that in that case, Emacs shouldn't take advantage of it. How else could > If it really works usefully with GCC -- if that is not just a theoretical > idea -- then I won't object to its supporting other compilers as well. be interpreted?