From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Nix Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: Becoming an Emacs contributor Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:26:19 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8r8ch50.fsf@esperi.org.uk> References: <87si59wj42.fsf@T420.taylan> <878u6znii9.fsf@T420.taylan> <836123gfh2.fsf@gnu.org> <87r3krm0t3.fsf@T420.taylan> <5624F66F.1030600@yandex.ru> <87io63lzkg.fsf@T420.taylan> <562508B7.3020202@yandex.ru> <876122n5v3.fsf@T420.taylan> <22053.50324.60123.654292@turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> <87d1waknl1.fsf@T420.taylan> <87oafugeia.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> <87io61epbv.fsf_-_@wanadoo.es> <87d1w9k8bb.fsf@T420.taylan> <83a8rdfqvd.fsf@gnu.org> <87eggpigxz.fsf@T420.taylan> <87vba1e89v.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1445707619 3929 80.91.229.3 (24 Oct 2015 17:26:59 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 24 Oct 2015 17:26:59 +0000 (UTC) Cc: ofv@wanadoo.es, Taylan Ulrich =?utf-8?Q?=22Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1?= =?utf-8?Q?=2FKammer=22?= , Eli Zaretskii , emacs-devel@gnu.org To: David Kastrup Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Oct 24 19:26:46 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq2ab-00012t-4X for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 19:26:45 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:45092 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq2aa-0007D2-8q for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:26:44 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:52159) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq2aL-0007Cm-QO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:26:30 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq2aK-00077X-Md for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:26:29 -0400 Original-Received: from icebox.esperi.org.uk ([81.187.191.129]:52154 helo=mail.esperi.org.uk) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1Zq2aE-00075z-2M; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 13:26:22 -0400 Original-Received: from spindle (nix@spindle.srvr.nix [192.168.14.15]) by mail.esperi.org.uk (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTP id t9OHQJtL002081; Sat, 24 Oct 2015 18:26:19 +0100 Emacs: why choose between a word processor and a Lisp interpreter when you could have neither instead? In-Reply-To: <87vba1e89v.fsf@fencepost.gnu.org> (David Kastrup's message of "Tue, 20 Oct 2015 19:53:32 +0200") User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.0.50 (gnu/linux) X-DCC-INFN-TO-Metrics: spindle 1233; Body=5 Fuz1=5 Fuz2=5 X-MIME-Autoconverted: from 8bit to quoted-printable by mail.esperi.org.uk id t9OHQJtL002081 X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 81.187.191.129 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:192562 Archived-At: On 20 Oct 2015, David Kastrup uttered the following: > taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer") writ= es: > >> Eli Zaretskii writes: >> >>>> From: taylanbayirli@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kamme= r) >>>> Date: Tue, 20 Oct 2015 14:56:08 +0200 >>>> Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org >>>>=20 >>>> This actually sounds pretty similar to what happened in this thread = in >>>> some ways, although it differs in other ways, so thanks for the inpu= t! >>> >>> You were given a single comment that required a one-line change in th= e >>> code. >> >> You were provided a patch that you only needed to apply. >> >> I win! > > Mistaking this for a competition might explain some of this thread. Quite. The purpose of a maintainer is not to apply changes without consideration or adjustment. (That would be the job of a committing robot.) --=20 NULL && (void)