From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!not-for-mail From: Rasmus Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: New update of the Emacs website (was Re: First draft of the Emacs website) Date: Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:17:33 +0100 Message-ID: <87a8pqp4rm.fsf@gmx.us> References: <565EE871.6030805@gmail.com> <87lh9az964.fsf@petton.fr> NNTP-Posting-Host: plane.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit X-Trace: ger.gmane.org 1449245908 18316 80.91.229.3 (4 Dec 2015 16:18:28 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Fri, 4 Dec 2015 16:18:28 +0000 (UTC) To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Fri Dec 04 17:18:19 2015 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by plane.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a4t3g-0000sL-DF for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:18:08 +0100 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:41788 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4t3f-0003Zy-Ri for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:18:07 -0500 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:53252) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4t3b-0003Zb-T2 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:18:04 -0500 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4t3W-0004Wu-Qd for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:18:03 -0500 Original-Received: from plane.gmane.org ([80.91.229.3]:42081) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a4t3W-0004V7-Gl for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 11:17:58 -0500 Original-Received: from list by plane.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1a4t3O-0000TJ-Fj for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:17:50 +0100 Original-Received: from 62.80.108.13 ([62.80.108.13]) by main.gmane.org with esmtp (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:17:50 +0100 Original-Received: from rasmus by 62.80.108.13 with local (Gmexim 0.1 (Debian)) id 1AlnuQ-0007hv-00 for ; Fri, 04 Dec 2015 17:17:50 +0100 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Lines: 37 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@ger.gmane.org X-Gmane-NNTP-Posting-Host: 62.80.108.13 Face: iVBORw0KGgoAAAANSUhEUgAAADAAAAAwCAAAAAByaaZbAAAAAmJLR0QA/4ePzL8AAAAJcEhZ cwAAAEgAAABIAEbJaz4AAAC3SURBVEiJ7ZI7CgMxDEQHLEICgVwr7UDuf4tAupdCu7b2U4ZUnsoy ehpZsjQ1NfVX2bZ7AJIASVIIl0xwSAD0eyOJl40ktQqEhJsElpaKCeA8xAokBY8BGGGvQPoPh15z 4wB8VgfbRmqtF3emJcASrC2981kFUKbchkOfx2lLumZWdCASiPLoZwWUXdyLQ21JeDdWyLwtMKaZ i4sypYXC7bB2FCNq202fA5To9GvsdTleTU1N/Uhf6/ehr00D3K8AAAAASUVORK5CYII= User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/25.1.50 (gnu/linux) Cancel-Lock: sha1:XT87H2D1633pFFOE/hdZL77iW5I= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: Genre and OS details not recognized. X-Received-From: 80.91.229.3 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:195892 Archived-At: Nicolas Petton writes: > Hi guys, > > I pushed a new update here: > http://nicolas-petton.fr/ressources/emacs-website/ > > Here's a summary of the changes: > > - Improve the header on mobile devices, as well as the navigation bar > - Adjusted the fonts following WCAG > - Added a librejs-compatible header to animations.js > - Changed the license to Commons Attribution-NoDerivs 3.0 United States > - Removed the duplicated logo from the header (that was there for mobiles) > - Various markup improvements > - Added an href to the "Learn more" anchor > - Added a solid background to theFSF logo > - Checked rendering in lynx and eww It looks amazing, Nicolas! I have two ’notes’. I don't care much for the icons used under the features. Lacking anything better they are fine, but perhaps something more distinct or informative could be used? I’m still find the Release part to stand out too much. Perhaps because it’s the only section with a dark font on a light background. Anyway, I don’t feel strongly about this issue. Thanks again. Rasmus -- A clever person solves a problem. A wise person avoids it