From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eric Abrahamsen Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel,gmane.emacs.gnus.general Subject: Re: [RFC] Gnus generalized search, part II Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 13:26:09 -0700 Message-ID: <87a878195q.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> References: <87zif930mt.fsf@ericabrahamsen.net> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1492892843 9871 195.159.176.226 (22 Apr 2017 20:27:23 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Sat, 22 Apr 2017 20:27:23 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/26.0.50 (gnu/linux) Cc: ding@gnus.org To: emacs-devel@gnu.org Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Sat Apr 22 22:27:19 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d21ck-0002QN-Pn for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 22:27:18 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:36763 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d21cq-0003D0-F6 for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:27:24 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33968) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d21cE-0003Cj-5v for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:26:49 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d21c9-0004B9-19 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:26:46 -0400 Original-Received: from [195.159.176.226] (port=42058 helo=blaine.gmane.org) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1d21c8-00049N-SD for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 16:26:40 -0400 Original-Received: from list by blaine.gmane.org with local (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1d21bz-0001Ti-89 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Sat, 22 Apr 2017 22:26:31 +0200 X-Injected-Via-Gmane: http://gmane.org/ Original-Followup-To: gmane.emacs.gnus.general Original-Lines: 14 Original-X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org Cancel-Lock: sha1:xCDX/Q97Gf7s/dhQzpFCk8c9SYQ= X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 195.159.176.226 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:214228 gmane.emacs.gnus.general:87470 Archived-At: Lars Ingebrigtsen writes: > Eric Abrahamsen writes: > >> The query entered by the user is parsed into a sexp structure, and then >> each engine is responsible for interpreting that. > > I think this sounds like a good approach. I haven't tried the code > myself, but I skimmed it briefly and it looks good to me. :-) Cool! Glad it's acceptable in theory. I am hoping that people who are likely to care about this stuff will argue about the search language syntax a bit. That will affect users the most, and also be the most annoying to change subsequently. The rest is just bugs :)