From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Path: news.gmane.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Gemini Lasswell Newsgroups: gmane.emacs.devel Subject: Re: [Emacs-diffs] master 06e452a 1/3: Allow Edebug's instrumentation to be used for other purposes Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 08:44:39 -0700 Message-ID: <87a80xadug.fsf@runbox.com> References: <20171008231448.29638.520@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> <20171008231451.3FBBC20326@vcs0.savannah.gnu.org> NNTP-Posting-Host: blaine.gmane.org Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain X-Trace: blaine.gmane.org 1507755672 25599 195.159.176.226 (11 Oct 2017 21:01:12 GMT) X-Complaints-To: usenet@blaine.gmane.org NNTP-Posting-Date: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 21:01:12 +0000 (UTC) User-Agent: mu4e 0.9.18; emacs 26.0.60 Cc: emacs-devel@gnu.org To: Stefan Monnier Original-X-From: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Wed Oct 11 23:01:08 2017 Return-path: Envelope-to: ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org Original-Received: from lists.gnu.org ([208.118.235.17]) by blaine.gmane.org with esmtp (Exim 4.84_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e2O7k-0005kc-Tk for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 23:01:05 +0200 Original-Received: from localhost ([::1]:42654 helo=lists.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2O7s-0005D3-Ey for ged-emacs-devel@m.gmane.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:01:12 -0400 Original-Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:41350) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2JC7-0005mm-GC for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:45:21 -0400 Original-Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2JC3-0000HG-DO for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:45:15 -0400 Original-Received: from aibo.runbox.com ([91.220.196.211]:44606) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:RSA_AES_128_CBC_SHA1:16) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1e2JC3-0000BK-24 for emacs-devel@gnu.org; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 11:45:11 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; q=dns/txt; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=runbox.com; s=rbselector1; h=Content-Type:MIME-Version:Message-ID:Date:In-reply-to: Subject:Cc:To:From:References; bh=W5EgfAkppdF3Jv0gFOJf42Ao37n/TT/yAtL43NIukWM=; b=LYgqk6XzT1dKGjQuwRYkeURMj+ fCbpqXCgpEReeGO/85hUfsEeM+62uC4eSFq6ZCiQOwuT+yLcVklGFyrWDLaOZ4Ow+5wIFC2QtNGZg WyfsG58cXwsoFSbbFX9MEgYsPzA6bee0/IpYe67Dm/GDhoqDWMh5EhSXf+SyR0rdQi1a+R/BVOWov pz06ie+wnhDdnkSs1wEcK9vsJnQiFap1OhAKwIIm3S7QwIDIHcpUv+XcgkbXFYj3K5Ay6AjH470H1 8WTlM87HLKPiGrsclbSiZvIlhayShPdUh7E8YTsKOcuEIEvBNAZuvKmSOgxdaqpma2xGWvwkTQCZC qN81eoaw==; Original-Received: from [10.9.9.211] (helo=mailfront11.runbox.com) by mailtransmit02.runbox with esmtp (Exim 4.86_2) (envelope-from ) id 1e2JBq-0006Pp-Ty; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:44:59 +0200 Original-Received: from 75-121-234-243.dyn.centurytel.net ([75.121.234.243] helo=sockeye) by mailfront11.runbox.com with esmtpsa (uid:179284 ) (TLS1.2:RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.82) id 1e2JBj-0006Si-Ix; Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:44:52 +0200 In-reply-to: X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] [fuzzy] X-Received-From: 91.220.196.211 X-Mailman-Approved-At: Wed, 11 Oct 2017 17:00:33 -0400 X-BeenThere: emacs-devel@gnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.21 Precedence: list List-Id: "Emacs development discussions." List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Errors-To: emacs-devel-bounces+ged-emacs-devel=m.gmane.org@gnu.org Original-Sender: "Emacs-devel" Xref: news.gmane.org gmane.emacs.devel:219393 Archived-At: Stefan Monnier writes: > This seems a bit awkward. > > How 'bout something like the 100% untested patch below? OK with me. I'll test the patch and make the change. Do you think edebug-after-instrumentation-functions should also be changed to edebug-after-instrumentation-function?